2003
DOI: 10.3201/eid0906.020645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corynebacterium ulceransDiphtheria in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it has been recommended that the public health response to human infection with C. ulcerans should be the same as that for C. diphtheriae (3). Recently, a fatal case of necrotizing sinusitis due to toxigenic C. ulcerans was reported in a previously healthy farmer in Germany (16), and Hatanaka et al (9) reported a case of diphtheria-like illness in a Japanese woman caused by toxigenic C. ulcerans; the patient had no direct contact with dairy livestock or unpasteurized dairy products; however, a week before the illness, the patient had been scratched by a cat with rhinorrhea (9). C. ulcerans has also been isolated from an asymptomatic carrier who had close contact with infected cattle (3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it has been recommended that the public health response to human infection with C. ulcerans should be the same as that for C. diphtheriae (3). Recently, a fatal case of necrotizing sinusitis due to toxigenic C. ulcerans was reported in a previously healthy farmer in Germany (16), and Hatanaka et al (9) reported a case of diphtheria-like illness in a Japanese woman caused by toxigenic C. ulcerans; the patient had no direct contact with dairy livestock or unpasteurized dairy products; however, a week before the illness, the patient had been scratched by a cat with rhinorrhea (9). C. ulcerans has also been isolated from an asymptomatic carrier who had close contact with infected cattle (3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results have the following implications: (i) C. ulcerans diphtheria probably does not result from a simple transfer of phages coding for the C. diphtheria toxin from C. diphtheria to C. ulcerans; (ii) toxins of C. ulcerans may induce either extrapharyngeal infection or diphtheria, depending more of the immunological status of the patient rather than on the nature of the toxin; and (iii) animals may be an environmental reservoir for sporadic cases of C. ulcerans diphtheria. The incidence of C. ulcerans infections in humans remains low; only a few cases have been reported in Denmark, Germany, Switzerland, The Netherlands, the United States, and Japan (2,5,7,8,14). In the United Kingdom, 24 cases of toxigenic C. ulcerans infections have been reported from 1993 to 1999 (8).…”
Section: Ulcerans Was First Isolated In 1926 By Gilbert and Stewarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our patient did not have risk factors associated with C. ulcerans infections, such as drinking raw milk or contact with farm animals or their waste (5,9,15). Recently, C. ulcerans producing diphtheria-like toxin was isolated from cats with nasal discharge in the United Kingdom (13).…”
Section: Ulcerans Was First Isolated In 1926 By Gilbert and Stewarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the present study showed that Salmonella strains circulating in wild Mallard ducks living in the Semnan suburb are potentially virulent for other hosts such as human and livestock because they contained virulence genes. Their importance and risk is higher considering that most published studies elsewhere in livestock emanate from small epizootics and are of either dead birds at feeding stations or infected birds in or around farms where the livestock was infected with Salmonella (Hatanaka et al, 2003). Waterfowl isolates could rapidly spread to other ducks because of their colonial and gathering characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%