1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.882411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Physical an Overview from Modern Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical limit of quantum mechanics is continuously an interesting research topic [1][2][3]. It is often considered thath → 0 gives the classical limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical limit of quantum mechanics is continuously an interesting research topic [1][2][3]. It is often considered thath → 0 gives the classical limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this pragmatic and admirably minimalist approach does not clarify exactly where this "Heisenberg cut" between the quantum system and the classical measuring apparatus or observer lies, and moreover how and also why its existence does not weaken the premise that all phenomena should be describable as quantum mechanical. As a criticism of this dual unitary-and-projection dynamics, Schrödinger proposed his well known cat paradox [4,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, they can help resolve the measurement problem, a subtle but arguably important problem in quantum epistemology and foundations. In simple words, it is concerned with understanding how macroscopic phenomena, in specific measurement outcomes, are classical even though the underlying microscopic states exist as quantum mechanical superpositions [4]. Let a system S to be measured be in the pure state |ψ = n i=1 a i |i , with n i=1 |a i | 2 = 1 where {|i } are a complete set of eigenstates of some observablê A that can be measured by a measuring apparatus M .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This picture is important as it illuminates our debates over the wave-particle nature of light and quantum uncertainty, framing the contrasts between the standard (Copenhagen) interpretation and several alternative interpretations. [12][13][14][15][16] For clarity, it is important to emphasize here the distinction between diffraction, which relates to the scattering and probability distribution for individual photons, and interference, which is a cooperative phenomenon that relates to the probabilities of detection (absorption?) when there is a multiplicity of photons (e.g., two electromagnetic beams) that can influence each other at the point of detection.…”
Section: Introductionmmentioning
confidence: 99%