2006
DOI: 10.1080/02643290500443250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Neuropsychologytwenty years on

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our view is that a careful examination of patterns of spared and impaired reasoning in such groups can contribute to the understanding of reasoning in both clinical and non-clinical populations (cf. Caramazza & Coltheart, 2006). For example, the finding that OCD-related symptoms are associated with impairments in some forms of induction but not others suggests that more than one underlying cognitive process drives inductive reasoning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our view is that a careful examination of patterns of spared and impaired reasoning in such groups can contribute to the understanding of reasoning in both clinical and non-clinical populations (cf. Caramazza & Coltheart, 2006). For example, the finding that OCD-related symptoms are associated with impairments in some forms of induction but not others suggests that more than one underlying cognitive process drives inductive reasoning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discipline of cognitive neuropsychology developed in the late 1970s, at a point when cognitive psychologists and neuropsychologists began to see how valuable the detailed investigation of cases of acquired brain impairment could be for informing models of cognition [1]. This approach has since produced a wealth of fascinating case studies that have contributed to our understanding of cognitive functioning across a wide range of domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This architecture or cognitive model represents the sequence of discrete information processing components involved in performing some particular cognitive operation, such as reading aloud or identifying a face. The processing components may be considered 'modules' of the form proposed by Fodor [8] although, as discussed in more detail by Caramazza & Coltheart [1], a strong modularity assumption is not necessarily required. The important feature is that the components are relatively autonomous and can be selectively impaired by brain damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in Administration C (Copy), these functions are isolated, allowing the evaluator to observe distinctions between performance in both administrations. Therefore, memory impairment may be reflected by worse performance on Administration A (Memory) but better performance on Administration C (Copy; Caramazza, & Coltheart, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%