2016
DOI: 10.1177/1751143716683713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clostridium perfringens sepsis complicated by right ventricular cardiogenic shock

Abstract: Clostridium perfringens sepsis has been ascribed a dismal prognosis when associated with massive intravascular haemolysis. We present a 71-year-old woman's fatal case which was compounded by isolated right ventricular cardiogenic shock. In this context, combined use of transthoracic echocardiography and pulmonary artery catheter monitoring is able to yield an individualized hemodynamic resuscitation. We discuss key aspects related to right and left heart mechanical efficiency, hypothesize as to the pulmonary h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, no randomized trials or evidence-based guidelines have defined a treatment regimen for clostridium toxic shock syndrome. The antibiotic regimens directed against Clostridium perfringens used in case series include penicillin four million units IV every four hours plus clindamycin 900 mg IV every eight hours [5,8,9]. Clindamycin, a bacteriostatic antibiotic, is often included in antibiotic regimens due to its ability to suppress toxin production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, no randomized trials or evidence-based guidelines have defined a treatment regimen for clostridium toxic shock syndrome. The antibiotic regimens directed against Clostridium perfringens used in case series include penicillin four million units IV every four hours plus clindamycin 900 mg IV every eight hours [5,8,9]. Clindamycin, a bacteriostatic antibiotic, is often included in antibiotic regimens due to its ability to suppress toxin production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%