1984
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.1984.12005749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clostridium difficileIsolation in Neonates in a Special Care Unit

Abstract: The stools of 78% of 45 infants in a Special Care Baby Unit yielded Clostridium difficile on culture, and in 67% of these it was possible to detect C. difficile toxin by means of a tissue culture technique. The stools of six of the seven infants with necrotizing enterocolitis were positive for C. difficile, but neither of the two most severely affected contained C. difficile toxin. The incidence of C. difficile isolation was similar in infants treated by exchange transfusion, those treated with antibiotics, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
1
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
8
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these findings were not significant in our study. Also, similarly to other studies [6, 7, 14, 21], in-hospital C. difficile colonization was not associated with the development of NEC in our study. This is an interesting finding as a recent in vivo study in mice described that neonatal acquisition of Clostridium spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, these findings were not significant in our study. Also, similarly to other studies [6, 7, 14, 21], in-hospital C. difficile colonization was not associated with the development of NEC in our study. This is an interesting finding as a recent in vivo study in mice described that neonatal acquisition of Clostridium spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…As standards of NICU care have significantly developed since then, colonization rates detected in our study might not be comparable to these studies. Indeed, a more recent study by Rousseau et al [15] already reported a C. difficile colonization rate in term neonates of 33%, which is in agreement with our study and significantly lower than colonization rates reported before [14]. However, besides this study and ours, no recent data on colonization rates in very preterm babies exist.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…* Several reports provided evidence that C. perfringens [297,[361][362][363][364], Clostridium difficile [333,365], or Clostridium butyricum, acting alone [366,367] or synergistically with Klebsiella [368], was able to evoke NEC. Subsequent studies indicated, however, that these species were often acquired from the nursery environment [369,370] and could frequently be recovered from healthy neonates [359,[370][371][372][373][374][375][376]. Clostridial cytotoxin, which had been recovered from the stool of infants involved in an outbreak of NEC [333,365], has also been found in the stool of 90% of normal infants [333,364,369,[375][376][377].…”
Section: Pathology and Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morbidity and risk factors for disease are not well defined. Infants younger than 1 year are commonly colonized with C difficile with colony counts equal to adults with CDAD, but do not manifest diarrhea or features of toxic enterocolitis [17][18][19][20][21]. Neonates are generally resistant to the effects of C difficile toxins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%