1997
DOI: 10.1086/516891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clostridium difficile‐Associated Diseases: Comparison of Symptomatic Infection Versus Carriage on the Basis of Risk Factors, Toxin Production, and Genotyping Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no association between the PCR ribotype of the infecting strain and the severity of disease. In accord with this result, others found no particular PCR ribotype predominant in cases of severe or relapsing CDAD (5,27,36,39), and the distributions of C. difficile immunoblot types were similar in symptomatic patients and in healthy carriers (24). However, Fawley et al (10) reported that a total of 17 strain types were isolated from both symptomatic patients and the hospital environment during a 4-year period, but only 4 of 17 types resulted in CDAD, suggesting a correlation between type and virulence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no association between the PCR ribotype of the infecting strain and the severity of disease. In accord with this result, others found no particular PCR ribotype predominant in cases of severe or relapsing CDAD (5,27,36,39), and the distributions of C. difficile immunoblot types were similar in symptomatic patients and in healthy carriers (24). However, Fawley et al (10) reported that a total of 17 strain types were isolated from both symptomatic patients and the hospital environment during a 4-year period, but only 4 of 17 types resulted in CDAD, suggesting a correlation between type and virulence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A cohort study showed no difference in the distributions of C. difficile immunoblot types between asymptomatic carriers and CDAD patients, suggesting that patient factors or bacterial numbers contribute to disease more than the properties of specific C. difficile strain types (24). In addition, for a total of 62 C. difficile strains isolated from 17 patients with CDAD and 11 carriers and typed by PCR ribotyping and by use of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA, no significant correlation between genotype and disease severity was found (5). In the United Kingdom, PCR ribotype 001 was shown to dominate in hospital settings nationwide but not in community-acquired CDAD, suggesting that this PCR ribotype (or a subtype) has an increased attack rate or greater ability for nosocomial spread (35).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In studies of C. difficile strains in patients with CDAD when compared to asymptomatic carriers, no difference has been found between organisms in each group. These data suggest that the development of CDAD may, in many cases, be primarily related to host bacterial flora composition and immunity rather than specific C. difficile strain type [20,21]. A study of different strains in patients with mild, moderate, and severe CDAD also failed to show a correlation between strain type and severity of disease [22].…”
Section: Clostridium Difficile Infection and The Immune Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24] In another study also no strain-specific difference for asymptomatic carrier versus patients with CDAD were seen and most strains from both the groups were toxigenic in vitro. [25] The antibody response before infection with C. difficile might also be very important in stopping the development of symptoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%