Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1080/0028825x.2021.1955714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Claudopus niger (Entolomataceae – Basidiomycota), a new species from the Argentinean Atlantic Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specimens were dried in a dehydration machine at 30 °C for 24 h, packed in plastic bags, and then stored. The colour codes used follow the Munsell Soil Color Charts (Munsell 1975). Micro-morphological examinations of the dried specimens were done with free-hand sections mounted in 5% potassium hydroxide (KOH) (w/v), 1% Congo red (w/v), and/or distilled water, followed by observation with a light microscope.…”
Section: Morphological Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specimens were dried in a dehydration machine at 30 °C for 24 h, packed in plastic bags, and then stored. The colour codes used follow the Munsell Soil Color Charts (Munsell 1975). Micro-morphological examinations of the dried specimens were done with free-hand sections mounted in 5% potassium hydroxide (KOH) (w/v), 1% Congo red (w/v), and/or distilled water, followed by observation with a light microscope.…”
Section: Morphological Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus is traditionally divided into up to 13 subgenera, based on morphological characteristics such as form of the basidiomata, structure of the pileipellis, shape of the basidiospores, presence/absence and shape of cystidia, and presence/absence of clamp connections (Romagnesi 1978;Noordeloos 1981Noordeloos , 2004Noordeloos and Gates 2012). These traditionally defined subgenera are treated at the rank of genera by some authors (Largent 1994; Baroni and Lodge 1998;Aime et al 2010;Baroni and Halling 2000;Karstedt et al 2020;Niveiro et al 2022). Phylogenetic studies (Co-David et al 2009) show that these subgenera in many cases are not monophyletic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%