2008
DOI: 10.1086/591230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chandra Detection of XTE J1650-500 in Quiescence and the Minimum Luminosity of Black Hole X-Ray Binaries

Abstract: The Galactic black hole X-ray binary XTE J1650-500 entered a quiescent regime following the decline from the 2001-2002 outburst that led to its discovery. Here we report on the first detection of its quiescent counterpart in a 36 ks observation taken in 2007 July with the Chandra X-ray Observatory. The inferred 0.5-10 keV unabsorbed flux is in the range 2.5-5.0 × 10 −15 erg s −1 cm −2 . Notwithstanding large distance uncertainties, the measured luminosity is comparable to that of the faintest detected black ho… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case that we measured the quiescent X‐ray flux level, this indicates that the decay of the outburst phase towards quiescence had an ‘inside–out’ development, starting with the fading of the X‐ray source only later followed by the optical. Moreover, assuming we measured the quiescent X‐ray flux, the quiescent luminosity for our estimate range of distances implies an orbital period longwards of 10 h, if XTE J1752−223 follows the trend between orbital period and quiescent X‐ray luminosity reported by Garcia et al (2001) and Gallo et al (2008). Instead, if the true quiescent luminosity is lower than measured, then the inferred orbital period would be shorter and more compatible with the orbital period inferred above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In the case that we measured the quiescent X‐ray flux level, this indicates that the decay of the outburst phase towards quiescence had an ‘inside–out’ development, starting with the fading of the X‐ray source only later followed by the optical. Moreover, assuming we measured the quiescent X‐ray flux, the quiescent luminosity for our estimate range of distances implies an orbital period longwards of 10 h, if XTE J1752−223 follows the trend between orbital period and quiescent X‐ray luminosity reported by Garcia et al (2001) and Gallo et al (2008). Instead, if the true quiescent luminosity is lower than measured, then the inferred orbital period would be shorter and more compatible with the orbital period inferred above.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In the soft state (which has luminosities similar to those of the hard state) the source appears to be NIR and optically dim relative to the distribution of other soft state LMXBs (Russell et al), but not significantly so. Furthermore, as noted by Gallo et al (2008), the late-time quiescent X-ray luminosity (L X ≈ 3 × 10 30 erg s −1 ) is at the lower end of the distribution of quiescent luminosities for black hole binaries, though, when compared with the quiescent optical luminosity (L Optical ≈ 10 30 erg s −1 ), the X-ray luminosity falls on the correlation of Russell et al, albeit at the low end. Obviously, because of NIR/optical observational bias (i.e., we only observe the brightest sources), caution has to be exercised when implying that a source is of a low luminosity compared to a distribution as we do here for the soft and quiescent states.…”
Section: The Weak Jet Of Xte J1650−500mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The luminosity of MAXI J1659-152 is plotted with a crossed black circle. Based on data presented in Gallo et al (2008), Rea et al (2011), Reynolds & Miller (2011), Homan et al (2013), Yang et al (2013) and Casares & Jonker (2013). (A color version of this figure is available in the online journal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%