I-Challenges: Influencing Others’ Perspectives by Mentioning Personal Experiences in Therapeutic Community Group Meetings

Pino, Marco

doi:10.1177/0190272517706048

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 32 publications

(47 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In responding to self-disclosures, speakers utilize a repertoire of means to display how they have come to know something, whether through evidencing their own experience by revealing private details or through resorting to claiming something as general knowledge. As pointed out by Pino (2017), challenging a peer's perspective is a delicate process, and making claims that are based on the speaker's own experiences is an effective way to challenge the other while maintaining a relationship with them.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peer responses to self-disclosures in group counseling

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drawing on conversation analysis, this study examines how peers respond to each other’s self-disclosures in group counseling interaction. Responses that display sharing and recognition of the experience normalize the experience and build an alliance among group members. This way, responses bring about social support. In addition, responses can offer a different perspective on the views presented in self-disclosures. The responses endorse or challenge the claims that are made and the stance taken in the initial self-disclosure, and link the personal, individual experience to general axioms. The implicit ways of responding to a self-disclosure allow a person to participate in a conversation about intimate and potentially delicate topics without revealing private details. Through self-disclosures and responses to them, participants talk into being the ideals of health counseling and healthy lifestyle: What kind of activities are considered eligible and attainable. The relation of these practices to the institutional goal is intricate. It builds on, first, the stance taken in the self-disclosure toward the institutional goal and the sociocultural values pertaining to it, and second, the responses’ alignment with that stance and what kind of values and ideals it further evokes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peer responses to self-disclosures in group counseling

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, in this paper, we argue that we still know very little about actual manifestations of persuasive conduct 'in the wild'. Taking a discursive psychological approach to the study of people in the settings that comprise their everyday lives, we respecify persuasion as a visible, situated, and interactive accomplishment, rather than starting from a conceptualisation of it as an outcome of invisible cognitive processes (Humă, Stokoe, & Sikveland, 2019;Pino, 2017;Wooffitt, 2005).…”

Section: Putting Persuasion (Back) In Its Interactional Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

Putting persuasion (back) in its interactional context

Humă

Stokoe

Sikveland

2020

Qualitative Research in Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, ethnomethodological research building on Garfinkel's (1967) pioneering analysis of the situated accomplishment of gender has presented a reconceptualization of asymmetries based on gender, race, and class as ongoing interactional accomplishments rather than merely ascribed or quantitatively measured attributes (West & Fenstermaker, 1995;West & Zimmerman, 1987). Moreover, conversation analytic studies based on Schegloff's (1997) principles have demonstrated how participants in interactions can use gender, race, and class categories (Stokoe, 2009;Whitehead, 2012Whitehead, , 2013, as well as "individual-level" attributes such as previous life experiences (Pino, 2017), as resources for producing actions and interpreting the actions of others. However, to our knowledge, no research has used ethnomethodological and conversation analytic methods to examine how factors such as these are produced or oriented to by participants specifically in interactions in which violence either occurs or is projected (by the participants) as a potential outcome.…”

Section: Situation-sensitive Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“Risk factors” in action: The situated constitution of “risk” in violent interactions.

Whitehead¹,

Bowman²,

Raymond³

2018

Psychology of Violence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:The objective of this report was to consider some ways in which a range of phenomena commonly treated as "risk factors" for violence (including social asymmetries based on factors such as gender, race, and class and drug or alcohol intoxication) become observable in violent (or potentially violent) interactions. In doing so, we contribute to a growing body of research focused on moving beyond cataloguing factors abstractly associated with risk for violent outcomes, toward specifying the ways in which these risk factors are constituted in "doing violence" itself. Method: We used an ethnomethodological and conversation analytic approach to examine the sequential unfolding of interactions in which violent actions are projected and/or realized, drawing on a collection of 105 videos downloaded from the video sharing site YouTube. Results: Our analysis demonstrates how participants in the interactions orient to or deploy "risk factors" as resources for the production of actions and/or for interpreting or accounting for the actions of themselves and others before, during, or after the production of violent actions. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that the target phenomena, rather than simply being abstracted "risk factors" (in a distal or "upstream" sense), are constitutive features of the in situ unfolding of conflicts in which violence comes to be projected (if not always realized) as an outcome. As a result, the ontological distance between "risk" and "enactments" of violence effectively dissolves when episodes in which these phenomena appear are subjected to detailed analysis.

show abstract

I-Challenges: Influencing Others’ Perspectives by Mentioning Personal Experiences in Therapeutic Community Group Meetings

Cited by 7 publications

References 32 publications

Peer responses to self-disclosures in group counseling

Peer responses to self-disclosures in group counseling

Putting persuasion (back) in its interactional context

“Risk factors” in action: The situated constitution of “risk” in violent interactions.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About