1988
DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top1502_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cause and Experiment in Introductory Psychology: An Analysis of R.S. Woodworth's Textbooks

Abstract: This article analyzes the emerging notion of experimental method and its relationship to causality in the various editions of R. S. Woodworth's (1921, 1929, 1934, 1940; Woodward & Marquis, 1947) widely used introductory psychology textbook. Beginning with the 1934 edition, experiment was defined as manipulating an independent variable, while holding all other variables constant, and observing the effects on a dependent variable. By the 1940 edition, Woodworth implied that experiments of this type reveal ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these other methods took second stage in textbook descriptions of psychological research methods and increasingly came to be evaluated in terms of their degree of adherence to some of the core ideals of laboratory experiments. For historical accounts of the rise of experimentation and its effects on the production of psychological knowledge, see O'Donnell (1979), Danziger (1990), Winston (1988Winston ( , 2004, Evans (1990) and Morawski (1988). 2 Three exceptions to this disregard are examined in the present study.…”
Section: Dilemmas Of the Psychology Experimentermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these other methods took second stage in textbook descriptions of psychological research methods and increasingly came to be evaluated in terms of their degree of adherence to some of the core ideals of laboratory experiments. For historical accounts of the rise of experimentation and its effects on the production of psychological knowledge, see O'Donnell (1979), Danziger (1990), Winston (1988Winston ( , 2004, Evans (1990) and Morawski (1988). 2 Three exceptions to this disregard are examined in the present study.…”
Section: Dilemmas Of the Psychology Experimentermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a more historical perspective, Thomas Teo's () study of German psychology textbooks in the beginning of the nineteenth century is a breath of fresh air. Andrew Winston's studies on textbook definitions and redefinitions of psychological experiments should be mentioned here (; Winston, ; Winston & Blais, ; MacMartin & Winston, ; Winston, ), as well as his study on the changes in presentation of race and heredity in introductory textbooks (Winston, Butzer, & Ferris, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupled with a series of Latourian readings of psychology's textbooks from the second part of the twentieth century by Mary Smyth (2001aSmyth ( , 2001bSmyth ( , 2004, and the already mentioned investigations of the experiment through psychological textbooks by Winston (1988;Winston & Blais, 1996; especially the discourse analysis in MacMartin & Winston, 2000), Morawski's approach offers a solid basis for a historiography of psychology's textbooks that fits nicely in the current discourse espoused by Olesko and Bensaude-Vincent. Maybe it is not a boom evidenced in other disciplinary histories, but it is a definite presence that must be mentioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%