2002
DOI: 10.2307/1543419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caranx latus (Carangidae) Chooses Dock Pilings to Attack Silverside Schools: A Tactic to Interfere With Stereotyped Escape Behavior of Prey?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These benthic prey represent a substantial part of the diet of juvenile jack species in general (Blaber and Cyrus, 1983;Smith and Parrish, 2002;Figueiredo and Pessanha, 2015;Medeiros et al, 2017) and are commonly eaten by other estuarine fish (Blaber, 1986;Vasconcelos Filho et al, 2003;Lira et al, 2017). The juveniles of the two species were also found to largely prey on pelagic fish like engraulids and clupeids in the three estuaries studied, as already reported from visual census studies in these ecosystems (Cermak, 2002). This indicates that, at least in estuaries, C. latus and C. hippos juveniles forage both at mid-water and directly above the substrate, feeding on a mix of pelagic and benthic prey.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These benthic prey represent a substantial part of the diet of juvenile jack species in general (Blaber and Cyrus, 1983;Smith and Parrish, 2002;Figueiredo and Pessanha, 2015;Medeiros et al, 2017) and are commonly eaten by other estuarine fish (Blaber, 1986;Vasconcelos Filho et al, 2003;Lira et al, 2017). The juveniles of the two species were also found to largely prey on pelagic fish like engraulids and clupeids in the three estuaries studied, as already reported from visual census studies in these ecosystems (Cermak, 2002). This indicates that, at least in estuaries, C. latus and C. hippos juveniles forage both at mid-water and directly above the substrate, feeding on a mix of pelagic and benthic prey.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It should be noted that hyperiid amphipods have been found in plankton tows at a dock habitat in Yaquina Bay (B. D. Schwartzkopf and A. Harris, Oregon State University, unpublished data), so this prey item can be locally available; plankton tows were not conducted at eelgrass sites so the presence of hyperiid amphipods at this habitat cannot be stated. The dock sites were located in deeper water than the eelgrass sites, so it is possible that individuals at dock habitats feed throughout the water column due to the increased depth and vertical structure provided by the pilings, which can increase predation risk (Cermak ). If foraging throughout the water column at the dock habitat does increase vulnerability to predators, this strategy may not be as beneficial as foraging within eelgrass habitats, which are known to provide refuge from predators (Cowan et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are certainly exceptions to this rule (Marinelli & Coull 1987). Predators may use structure to interfere with the stereotyped escape behavior of prey, thus increasing the likelihood of prey capture (Cermak 2002). Structure may benefit ambush predators more than their prey by providing them with cover to attack from (James & Heck 1994, Flynn & Ritz 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%