2015
DOI: 10.1080/10609164.2015.1040275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CapacWomen and the Politics of Marriage in Early Colonial Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of all the modes adopted by local societies in the Americas to face and integrate into Spanish colonial society, three were the most common: association with the Spaniards to fight against a common enemy (Baber 2010; Bravo 2003; Matthew and Oudijk 2007; Sheridan 2001; Stern 1986; Ruiz-Esquide 1993), elite individuals who collaborated to save their social status (Lamana 1997, 2001; Medinaceli 2007; Rosas 2009; Saignes 1987), and interethnic marriage alliances (Bauer and Covey 2002; Deagan 2001; Herrera 2007; Vicuña 2015). This case shows a combination of the first two modes, combined with the fear of rebellion at the northern entrance of the kingdom, after almost a decade of indigenous struggle against Spanish rule (Garrido and González 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all the modes adopted by local societies in the Americas to face and integrate into Spanish colonial society, three were the most common: association with the Spaniards to fight against a common enemy (Baber 2010; Bravo 2003; Matthew and Oudijk 2007; Sheridan 2001; Stern 1986; Ruiz-Esquide 1993), elite individuals who collaborated to save their social status (Lamana 1997, 2001; Medinaceli 2007; Rosas 2009; Saignes 1987), and interethnic marriage alliances (Bauer and Covey 2002; Deagan 2001; Herrera 2007; Vicuña 2015). This case shows a combination of the first two modes, combined with the fear of rebellion at the northern entrance of the kingdom, after almost a decade of indigenous struggle against Spanish rule (Garrido and González 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%