2008
DOI: 10.1128/jb.01928-07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Campylobacter jejuniCsrA Mediates Oxidative Stress Responses, Biofilm Formation, and Host Cell Invasion

Abstract: The putative global posttranscriptional regulator csrA was mutated in Campylobacter jejuni 81-176. The csrA mutant was attenuated in surviving oxidative stress. CsrA also contributed to biofilm formation and adherence to and invasion of INT407 intestinal epithelial cells, suggesting a regulatory role for CsrA in C. jejuni pathogenesis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
150
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
6
150
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work in the distantly related C. jejuni is consistent with the B. subtilis model, in which FliW antagonizes CsrA and CsrA inhibits flagellin translation (39). Thus, the noncompetitive mechanism of inhibition that governs the CsrA-FliW-flagellin module is likely to be directly applicable to all FliW-encoding organisms, including members of the firmicutes, the spirochetes, and the deep branches of the proteobacteria (34,39,(45)(46)(47)(48). In contrast, competitive inhibition of CsrA by sRNA has been extensively studied, but only in bacteria belonging to the family of γ-proteobacteria (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent work in the distantly related C. jejuni is consistent with the B. subtilis model, in which FliW antagonizes CsrA and CsrA inhibits flagellin translation (39). Thus, the noncompetitive mechanism of inhibition that governs the CsrA-FliW-flagellin module is likely to be directly applicable to all FliW-encoding organisms, including members of the firmicutes, the spirochetes, and the deep branches of the proteobacteria (34,39,(45)(46)(47)(48). In contrast, competitive inhibition of CsrA by sRNA has been extensively studied, but only in bacteria belonging to the family of γ-proteobacteria (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The phylogenetic distribution of sRNA competitors is poorly understood because of difficulties in predicting sRNA presence, expression, and function, but the conservation of the BarA-UvrY two component system that regulates csrB and csrC expression is largely restricted to the γ-proteobacteria, suggesting the sRNA mechanism of CsrA antagonism is narrowly distributed (34,38,49). Finally we note that, whether an organism uses sRNAs or FliW for regulation, CsrA regulates virulence factors in each pathogen in which it has been studied (1,(45)(46)(47)(48). We suggest that CsrA is a candidate therapeutic target and that the precedent for noncompetitive inhibition can be exploited to isolate noncompetitive inhibitors, which are typically effective at lower doses than competitive counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several bacterial species exhibit altered levels of oxidative stress response proteins depending on the levels of regulation by CsrA (10,29,79). But in B. burgdorferi, overexpression of CsrA Bb does not seem to have an effect on the levels of two critical proteins involved in mediating resistance to oxidative stress, namely, NapA and SodA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, examination of C. jejuni's aggregation and biofilm formation showed no significant difference between the mutants and the wild-type strain (results not shown), indicating that the impaired invasion of the four tlp mutants was not caused by major modifications of global surface structures. We further examined whether the reduced invasion was mediated by altered gene expression of known virulence factors by studying the transcriptional expression of cadF, ciaB, and csrA, encoding a fibronectin binding protein, a host cell internalization protein, and a putative global regulator, respectively (16,26,27). However, Northern blot experiments revealed no change in the expression profiles of cadF, ciaB, and crsA for the invasion-deficient tlp1 and docB mutants (results not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%