2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

C n ( n =2−4): current status

Abstract: The major aspects of the C, C and C elemental carbon clusters are surveyed. For C, a brief analysis of its current status is presented. Regarding C, the most recent results obtained in our group are reviewed with emphasis on modelling its potential energy surface which is particularly complicated due to the presence of multiple conical intersections. As for C, the most stable isomeric forms of both triplet and singlet spin states and their possible interconversion pathways are examined afresh by means of accur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 183 publications
(577 reference statements)
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we consider the linear geometry which has been found to be the most stable isomer, although the potential energy surface around this minimum is known to be particularly at. 181 Similarly to C 2 , we have studied two transitions -1 1 Σ + g → 1 1 ∆ g and 1 1 Σ + g → 2 1 Σ + g -which also both involve excitations from the occupied π CC orbitals to the vacant σ CC orbitals. ese lie higher in energy than in the dimer but remain energetically close to each other.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we consider the linear geometry which has been found to be the most stable isomer, although the potential energy surface around this minimum is known to be particularly at. 181 Similarly to C 2 , we have studied two transitions -1 1 Σ + g → 1 1 ∆ g and 1 1 Σ + g → 2 1 Σ + g -which also both involve excitations from the occupied π CC orbitals to the vacant σ CC orbitals. ese lie higher in energy than in the dimer but remain energetically close to each other.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No comparison is possible with a VT Z basis, since M06-2X does not predict such a saddle point; a similar finding is reported by Ngandjong et al [19] with M06-2X/AVDZ. Of course, the above remarkable agreement may have been somewhat accidental as the CASDC/CBS(T, Q) estimate [9] for the relative stability of the cyclic vs linear forms places the latter only 6.14 kcal mol −1 above the former, a value smaller by ∼50 % than VOS-MP2/CBS(d, t) and nearly four times smaller than M06-2X [19].…”
Section: The Carbon Clusters: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The calculations here reported entail two parts. The first aims at validation of the method by testing its reliability on singlet C 4 which we have studied elsewhere at high levels of ab initio theory [9]. For this, we consider the conversion of rhombic (r − C 4 ) into linear ( − C 4 ) isomeric Fig.…”
Section: The Carbon Clusters: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations