2018
DOI: 10.2216/17-54.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bysmatrum austrafrum sp. nov. (Dinophyceae), a novel tidal pool dinoflagellate from South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the finding of a type A eyespot in other species of family Peridiniopsidaceae, such as Palatinus apiculatus (Craveiro et al, 2009). A type B eyespot in J. chumphonensis is not surprising since a type B eyespot was also reported in Peridiniopsis borgei (Calado & Moestrup, 2002) and both types may occur in species of the same genus such as Bysmatrum (Dawut et al, 2018;Luo et al, 2018). A type A eyespot was also reported in Peridinium cinctum, the type species of family Peridiniaceae (Spector & Triemer, 1979), supporting its systematic significance at family or higher taxonomic level (Lindberg et al, 2005).…”
Section: Eyespotsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is consistent with the finding of a type A eyespot in other species of family Peridiniopsidaceae, such as Palatinus apiculatus (Craveiro et al, 2009). A type B eyespot in J. chumphonensis is not surprising since a type B eyespot was also reported in Peridiniopsis borgei (Calado & Moestrup, 2002) and both types may occur in species of the same genus such as Bysmatrum (Dawut et al, 2018;Luo et al, 2018). A type A eyespot was also reported in Peridinium cinctum, the type species of family Peridiniaceae (Spector & Triemer, 1979), supporting its systematic significance at family or higher taxonomic level (Lindberg et al, 2005).…”
Section: Eyespotsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Consequently, it is quite difficult to distinguish B. subsalsum from B. austrafrum, based on their morphological features. Nevertheless, different types of eyespots have been reported in B. subsalsum and B. austrafrum [6,8]. Based on the types of eyespots suggested by Moestrup and Daugbjerg [21], B. subsalsum has the Type B eyespot, whereas B. austrafrum presents the Type A eyespot.…”
Section: Morphological Comparisons Of Korean Isolates Of Bysmatrum Subsalsum With Other Isolates Of B Subsalsum and B Austrafrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species has a typical plate of Po, X, 4 , 3a, 7", 6C, 4S, 5 , 2 for the genus Bysmatrum and is morphologically characterized by dimensions of 25-45 µm long and 20-42.5 µm wide, arranged reticulation in the thecal plates, the possession of an equatorially positioned cingulum and a cingulum displaced by a distance exceeding its own width. Based on these morphological features, Dawut et al [6] reported that B. austrafrum is similar to B. subsalsum, and concluded that B. austrafrum can be distinguished from B. subsalsum by differences in cell size, the shape of the APC and apical plate 1 . However, cell sizes recorded in B. austrafrum were recorded in the other specimens of B. subsalsum (see Table 2 in Luo et al [8]), and the shapes of the APC and apical plate 1 of B. austrafrum quite resembled those of Korean isolates and the specimens of B. subsalsum recorded by Luo et al [8].…”
Section: Morphological Comparisons Of Korean Isolates Of Bysmatrum Subsalsum With Other Isolates Of B Subsalsum and B Austrafrummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations