1963
DOI: 10.1080/00480169.1963.33504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brucella ovisvaccination of rams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both vaccines have the disadvantages of inducing OPS-specific antibody responses that interfere with serological diagnosis of disease (7,24,28,40,46), of causing abortion in vaccinated animals under some circumstances (19,27), and of being pathogenic for humans (6,53). Alternative vaccines to strains 19 and Rev 1 have been sought for many years, with limited success (1,8,15,18,32,37,47).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both vaccines have the disadvantages of inducing OPS-specific antibody responses that interfere with serological diagnosis of disease (7,24,28,40,46), of causing abortion in vaccinated animals under some circumstances (19,27), and of being pathogenic for humans (6,53). Alternative vaccines to strains 19 and Rev 1 have been sought for many years, with limited success (1,8,15,18,32,37,47).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced fertility of rams is the most serious consequence of this disease (29), although abortion also occurs (19,27,47). The principal vaccine used against ovine brucellosis has been REV 1, a live attenuated strain of B. melitensis (5,6,8,15,28). Although REV 1 is effective when administered to lambs (5), it is less effective in vaccination of adult animals (53).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, this vaccine is virulent for humans (15), and its use is prohibited in the United States due to the possibility of transmitting B. melitensis. Bacterins of B. ovis in several adjuvants have been tested in rams and have provided protection against infection and disease to 50% or more of the vaccinated animals (1,6,8,26,28,49,50). However, bacterins were subject to several disadvantages including the need for multiple vaccinations, the development of lesions at the site of injection, and the induction of immune responses that interfered with the interpretation of diagnostic tests (30,50,58).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2)(3) Subsequently, it was shown that two doses of the inactivated vaccine given subcutaneously a few weeks apart produced a comparable resistance. (4) (5) However, this later method fell out of favour because of the unsightly lesions which developed at the site of vaccination in the neck.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%