2015
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacillus subtilisRecO and SsbA are crucial for RecA-mediated recombinational DNA repair

Abstract: Genetic data have revealed that the absence of Bacillus subtilis RecO and one of the end-processing avenues (AddAB or RecJ) renders cells as sensitive to DNA damaging agents as the null recA, suggesting that both end-resection pathways require RecO for recombination. RecA, in the rATP·Mg2+ bound form (RecA·ATP), is inactive to catalyze DNA recombination between linear double-stranded (ds) DNA and naked complementary circular single-stranded (ss) DNA. We showed that RecA·ATP could not nucleate and/or polymerize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
64
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
8
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The requirement for RecR in the AdnAB pathway implies that AdnAB does not have intrinsic mediator activity, in contrast to E. coli RecBCD, which does have such activity. This finding is similar to recent data from B. subtilis showing that RecO, and possibly RecR, are required for RecA loading and strand exchange, even in the presence of AddAB (49). However, our data also indicate that the combination of ⌬recO and ⌬recF abolishes HR, thus phenocopying loss of RecR.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The requirement for RecR in the AdnAB pathway implies that AdnAB does not have intrinsic mediator activity, in contrast to E. coli RecBCD, which does have such activity. This finding is similar to recent data from B. subtilis showing that RecO, and possibly RecR, are required for RecA loading and strand exchange, even in the presence of AddAB (49). However, our data also indicate that the combination of ⌬recO and ⌬recF abolishes HR, thus phenocopying loss of RecR.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In their ATP-bound form, these recombinases can nucleate on protein-free ssDNA, but they cannot catalyze DSE in the absence of accessory factors (inactive RecA) ( 10 , 32 – 34 ). Unlike RecA Eco ·ATP ( 11 – 13 ) or RecA·dATP ( 32 , 35 ), RecA·ATP cannot nucleate or polymerize in the SsbA– or SsbB–ssDNA complexes ( 10 , 16 , 17 , 36 ). The presence of DprA reverses the negative effect of SsbA or SsbB on RecA filament growth, and DprA–SsbA are necessary and sufficient to activate RecA·ATP to catalyze bidirectional DSE, with greater efficiency in the 5′→3′ direction ( 10 , 17 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High expression levels at recJ and rrnO are unsurprising given that their products are a single-strand DNA-specific exonuclease involved in recombinational DNA repair and genome maintenance, and the 23S rRNA respectively. Disruption of recJ is reported to increase susceptibility to killing by DNA damaging agents (Carrasco et al, 2015). This should be considered if recJ is chosen as insertion locus for strains with applications where this may be problematic, for instance in long continuous fermentations.…”
Section: Additional Partsmentioning
confidence: 99%