The Prosody-Morphology Interface 1999
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511627729.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Austronesian nasal substitution and other NC effects

Abstract: Walker, and the participants in LING 751, UMass, and the Rutgers/UMass Joint Class Meeting, Spring 1995, for useful suggestions, and to Heather Goad and Glyne Piggott for their indispensible guidance. I would also like to acknowledge Choirul Djamhari for his help with the Indonesian data, and Lisa Travis for making it possible for me to work with him, as well as Jan Voskuil for his hospitality and assistance in securing many of the Austronesian materials during an all too short visit to Leiden.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
144
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The items in which the target consonants come after nasal consonants were avoided because nasals encourage voicing-and may hinder devoicing-in the following consonants (Hayes and Stivers, 1995;Pater, 1999 …”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The items in which the target consonants come after nasal consonants were avoided because nasals encourage voicing-and may hinder devoicing-in the following consonants (Hayes and Stivers, 1995;Pater, 1999 …”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I argue that the behavior of geminates in Polish constitutes a classic case of a conspiracy (Kisseberth 1970, Pater 1999. Two processes -deletion and epenthesisconspire to avoid non-intervocalic geminates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Following Pater's (1999) analysis of nasal substitution in Indonesian, I attribute the higher rate of substitution on voiceless-initial stems to a constraint *NC , which forbids a sequence of a nasal and a voiceless obstruent:…”
Section: The Voicing Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting with *NC , unlike in Malay/Indonesian (Pater 1999), it clearly cannot be the driving constraint for Tagalog nasal substitution, because it applies to both voiced and voiceless obstruents.…”
Section: Alternative Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%