1999
DOI: 10.1126/science.284.5414.629
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Australopithecus garhi : A New Species of Early Hominid from Ethiopia

Abstract: The lack of an adequate hominid fossil record in eastern Africa between 2 and 3 million years ago (Ma) has hampered investigations of early hominid phylogeny. Discovery of 2.5 Ma hominid cranial and dental remains from the Hata beds of Ethiopia's Middle Awash allows recognition of a new species of Australopithecus. This species is descended from Australopithecus afarensis and is a candidate ancestor for early Homo. Contemporary postcranial remains feature a derived humanlike humeral/femoral ratio and an apelik… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
241
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
241
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Presumably, this morphology was present in the common ancestor of the African great apes and early humans, along with rudimentary tool-using and symbolic behaviors. By the Late Pliocene, humans were relying on intensified cultural behaviors, particularly the use of stone tool technology in foraging and food processing (42,43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably, this morphology was present in the common ancestor of the African great apes and early humans, along with rudimentary tool-using and symbolic behaviors. By the Late Pliocene, humans were relying on intensified cultural behaviors, particularly the use of stone tool technology in foraging and food processing (42,43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.5 Ma sediments in the Middle Awash of Ethiopia. 54 While it does not seem to be a member of the Paranthropus clade based on other aspects of its craniofacial morphology, it is too early to know how it is related to other hominins. Finally, most researchers accept that the derived morphology shared between Paranthropus and Homo, such as cranial base flexion, either evolved independently in the two lineages or was inherited from an as-yet undiscovered recent common ancestor of the Paranthropus and Homo clades.…”
Section: How Many Species?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bahrelghazali (Chad, about 3·5 Mya (72) ), Kenyanthropus platyops (Kenya, about 3·5 Mya (73) ), Au. garhi (Ethiopia, about 2·5 Mya (74) ) and Au. africanus (South Africa, about 2·9 -2·0 Mya (75) ).…”
Section: Human Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, cut marks on bone are easier ascribed to human utilisation than any nearby found fossilised fish bones or molluscan shells that only seldomly bear cut marks (260,261) and are often not even examined. Hence, while human remains are nearly always found in the vicinity of water and the fossil record of nearby found fish is extensive (74,262) , the exploitation of aquatic resources is difficult to relate to early man (263) .…”
Section: Archeologymentioning
confidence: 99%