2012
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1200355109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arabidopsis circadian clock protein, TOC1, is a DNA-binding transcription factor

Abstract: The first described feedback loop of the Arabidopsis circadian clock is based on reciprocal regulation between TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1) and CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1)/LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY). CCA1 and LHY are Myb transcription factors that bind directly to the TOC1 promoter to negatively regulate its expression. Conversely, the activity of TOC1 has remained less well characterized. Genetic data support that TOC1 is necessary for the reactivation of CCA1/LHY, but there is little descrip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

26
442
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 444 publications
(474 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(66 reference statements)
26
442
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This elegant system directly couples CO stability and function in photoperiodic flowering to cycling circadian‐clock components, ensuring that CO only binds to and activates FT transcription at specific times during the day dependent on day length. Since CO and PRRs contain similar CCT DNA‐binding domains (Matsushika et al , 2000; Gendron et al , 2012), PRRs might also bind along with CO to the FT promoter and contribute to the control of FT transcription, as was recently shown for the interaction between PRRs and PIF transcription factors on their target genes (Soy et al , 2016; Zhu et al , 2016). Morning FT expression is more pronounced when plants are exposed to shade (Wollenberg et al , 2008), suggesting that specific PRRs might also control this process by coupling a distinct flowering signal to CO protein stability or FT induction in the morning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This elegant system directly couples CO stability and function in photoperiodic flowering to cycling circadian‐clock components, ensuring that CO only binds to and activates FT transcription at specific times during the day dependent on day length. Since CO and PRRs contain similar CCT DNA‐binding domains (Matsushika et al , 2000; Gendron et al , 2012), PRRs might also bind along with CO to the FT promoter and contribute to the control of FT transcription, as was recently shown for the interaction between PRRs and PIF transcription factors on their target genes (Soy et al , 2016; Zhu et al , 2016). Morning FT expression is more pronounced when plants are exposed to shade (Wollenberg et al , 2008), suggesting that specific PRRs might also control this process by coupling a distinct flowering signal to CO protein stability or FT induction in the morning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The plant circadian clock is based on interlocking transcriptional feedback loops in which the morning clock factors CCA1 and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) repress the expression of evening clock genes such as TOC1/PRR1 (28). In addition, CCA1 and LHY also promote the expression of PRR9 and PRR7 (29), which, sequentially with PRR5 and TOC1/PRR1, repress CCA1 and LHY expression throughout the remaining of the day and early night (30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCA1 and LHY then promote the expression of PRR9 and PRR7 (29), whereas LNK1 and LNK2 act later during the day to activate clock genes with peak expression in the afternoon, such as PRR5 and ELF4. Simultaneously, members of the TOC1/PRR family repress these morning genes throughout the afternoon and beginning of the night (30)(31)(32)40). Finally, the progressive reduction in TOC1/PRR levels leave CCA1, LHY, and the LNK genes poised to respond again to light signals that reset the clock every morning (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some Arabidopsis pseudo-response regulators (APRRs) respond to cytokinin (Brandstatter and Kieber, 1998;D'Agostino et al, 2000) and are involved in control of the circadian clock (Nakamichi et al, 2005). The C-terminal motif of APRRs is involved in recognition of certain specific DNA for clock regulation Gendron et al, 2012). Moreover, the response regulators (RRs) accumulate near the lateral roots, where they regulate cytokinin signaling (Mason et al, 2004;Kushwah et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%