1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.2807734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
726
0
22

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 956 publications
(766 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
18
726
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…In coordinate space, the Fourier transform of this function is the Feynman propagator D F (x), which has non-zero support inside and outside the light cone (for example, see section 2.4 of [7]). However, with a different i prescription, the Fourier transform of 1/P 2 in four dimensions has its support on the light cone.…”
Section: Jhep10(2004)074mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In coordinate space, the Fourier transform of this function is the Feynman propagator D F (x), which has non-zero support inside and outside the light cone (for example, see section 2.4 of [7]). However, with a different i prescription, the Fourier transform of 1/P 2 in four dimensions has its support on the light cone.…”
Section: Jhep10(2004)074mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cartan's and Bain's preference for unification, which they thought unsatisfiable, is adequately realized using OP spinors, for which the group that makes ψ a spinor is the (double cover of) a Lorentz group that is a subgroup of the space-time coordinate transformations. OP spinors, unlike the spinors of the tetrad formalism, are thus a strict generalization of the spinors in Minkowski space-time in Cartesian coordinates, such as one finds in standard particle physics books [Kaku, 1993, Peskin andSchroeder, 1995]. While the answers regarding spinors and the conventionality of simultaneity have varied considerably, and all the previous answers have flaws, the question is a very welcome one in the sense that it provides a rare instance of consideration of the relevance of electrons, protons, and the like to philosophical questions about space-time theory.…”
Section: Spinors and The Partial Conventionality Of Simultaneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 yields the two terms A (2) 11 + 2A (2) 21 , where the first will be linear in the couplings coming from L (1) , and the latter will depend only on L (0) .…”
Section: Rge For the Highest Polesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ( The meaning of these equations is as follows: the first one implies that the part of the subleading poles that comes from two-loop diagrams is given by the single pole from one-loop diagrams (A (3) 11 ) after one has substituted one L (1) (L (2) ) vertex with A (1) 11 (A (2) 11 ). According to the second one the double pole coming from three-loop diagrams is given by two terms: the first one is obtained from single poles from two-loop diagrams after substitution of one L (1) vertex with A (1) 11 , and the second one from single poles from one-loop diagrams after substitution of one L (2) vertex with 2A (2) 21 , i.e.…”
Section: Rge For the Subleading Polesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation