2001
DOI: 10.1107/s0108768100018905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio structure determination of monoclinic 2,2-dihydroxymethylbutanoic acid from synchrotron radiation powder diffraction data: combined use of direct methods and the Monte Carlo method

Abstract: The crystal structure of 2,2-dihydroxymethylbutanoic acid (C 6 H 12 O 4 ) in monoclinic form has been determined ab initio from synchrotron radiation powder diffraction data. Two O and ®ve C atoms were ®rst derived by direct methods. Two missing O atoms and one C atom were found by the Monte Carlo method without applying constraint to their relative positions. Positional and isotropic displacement parameters of these non-H atoms were re®ned by the Rietveld method. Molecules are linked by hydrogen bonds and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two oxygen and five carbon atoms among the ten nonhydrogen atoms were first derived by the direct method. The missing two oxygen and one carbon atoms were found by the present procedure without applying constraints to their relative positions (Tanahashi et al, 2001).…”
Section: Structure Determination Of 22-dihydroxymethylbutanoic Acid mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Two oxygen and five carbon atoms among the ten nonhydrogen atoms were first derived by the direct method. The missing two oxygen and one carbon atoms were found by the present procedure without applying constraints to their relative positions (Tanahashi et al, 2001).…”
Section: Structure Determination Of 22-dihydroxymethylbutanoic Acid mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The basis of the direct-space strategy for structure solution is to find the trial crystal structure corresponding to lowest R-factor and is equivalent to exploring a hypersurface R(Γ) to find the global minimum, where Γ represents the set of variables that define the structure. In principle, any technique for global optimization may be used to find the lowest point on the R(Γ) hypersurface, and much success has been achieved in using Monte Carlo/simulated annealing 16, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and genetic algorithm [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] methods in this field. In addition, grid search [37][38][39][40][41] and differential evolution 42 minations of organic molecular solids from powder diffraction data have used the direct-space strategy, although we note that there have also been a number of successful structure determinations of such materials using the traditional approach.…”
Section: Structure Determination From Powder Diffraction Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of the direct-space strategy for structure solution is to find the trial crystal structure corresponding to lowest R-factor, and is equivalent to exploring a hypersurface R (Γ) to find the global minimum, where Γ represents the set of variables that define the structure. In principle, any technique for global optimization may be used to find the lowest point on the R (Γ) hypersurface, and much success has been achieved in using the MC, , simulated annealing, and GA , methods in this field. In addition, grid search and differential evolution methods have also been employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%