1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.2522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initiooptical properties of Si(100)

Abstract: We compute the linear optical properties of different reconstructions of the clean and hydrogenated Si(100) surface within DFT-LDA, using norm conserving pseudopotentials. The equilibrium atomic geometries of the surfaces, determined from self-consistent total energy calculations within the Car-Parrinello scheme, strongly influence Reflectance Anisotropy Spectra (RAS), showing differences between the p(2 × 2) and c(4 × 2) reconstructions. The Differential Reflectivity spectrum for the c(4 × 2) reconstruction s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

19
62
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
19
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the SETB results, the corresponding spectrum of the Te-terminated ð2  1Þ surface shows a good agreement with that of the experiment. Meanwhile the spectrum of the Cd-terminated ð2  1Þ surface show a significant difference with the experimental data since it is more sensitive to the local geometry and the omission of secondneighbor interactions in the sp 3 s à scheme used in our calculation is mostly responsible for that discrepancy [24]. Many-body effects beyond the scissor correction, like the GW approximation, and the excitonic effects included through the Bethe-Salpeter equation [25] ought to be pursued in order to improve upon the present calculation.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of the SETB results, the corresponding spectrum of the Te-terminated ð2  1Þ surface shows a good agreement with that of the experiment. Meanwhile the spectrum of the Cd-terminated ð2  1Þ surface show a significant difference with the experimental data since it is more sensitive to the local geometry and the omission of secondneighbor interactions in the sp 3 s à scheme used in our calculation is mostly responsible for that discrepancy [24]. Many-body effects beyond the scissor correction, like the GW approximation, and the excitonic effects included through the Bethe-Salpeter equation [25] ought to be pursued in order to improve upon the present calculation.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…On the other hand, the SETB calculated spectrum has, at around 3 eV, opposite sign with respect to the experimental and ab initio spectra. This discrepancy can be explained on the basis that the SETB approach only takes into account nearest-neighbors interactions [24]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…3. Such calculations have already been successful in determining the RAS response for clean Si(001), where interesting agreement was found upon comparing experimental RAS data arising from surface Si(001) terraces with calculations of the RAS response for c(2 Â 4) and p(2 Â 2) reconstructed surfaces [21]. From Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These are affected by local-field effects [50], that reveal the inhomogeneities in the material, which are by far more prevalent perpendicular to the surface than in the surface plane. This can be evidenced for Si, as reflectance anisotropy spectroscopy measurements are well described by ab initio calculations neglecting local-field effects [51,52]. It is therefore expected that the out-of-plane components will be more sensitive to the inclusion of local fields.…”
Section: Calculated R P P Compared To Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 81%