2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3543898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio mass tensor molecular dynamics

Abstract: Mass tensor molecular dynamics was first introduced by Bennett [J. Comput. Phys. 19, 267 (1975)] for efficient sampling of phase space through the use of generalized atomic masses. Here, we show how to apply this method to ab initio molecular dynamics simulations with minimal computational overhead. Test calculations on liquid water show a threefold reduction in computational effort without making the fixed geometry approximation. We also present a simple recipe for estimating the optimal atomic masses using… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 In this case, the atomic masses m were rescaled to m H = 1.236 44, m Li = 0.284 44, and m B = 4.444 44 following the treatment in Ref. 28. These were chosen to minimize the mismatch between the slow motion of the lithium atoms ( 500 cm −1 ) and the fast B−H stretch motion (2400 cm −1 ) of the original system.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 In this case, the atomic masses m were rescaled to m H = 1.236 44, m Li = 0.284 44, and m B = 4.444 44 following the treatment in Ref. 28. These were chosen to minimize the mismatch between the slow motion of the lithium atoms ( 500 cm −1 ) and the fast B−H stretch motion (2400 cm −1 ) of the original system.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, to make the MD calculations more efficient, we took advantage of the fact that the ensemble averages, such as radial distribution functions and free energies, do not depend on the atomic masses. 28 In this case, the atomic masses m were rescaled to m H = 1.236 44, m Li = 0.284 44, and m B = 4.444 44 following the treatment in Ref. 28.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm may also be used in conjunction with other methods to accelerate the simulations even further, such as the Langevin dynamics [5][6][7][8] , linear scaling method [24][25][26] and mass scaling method 27 . …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark here that the main advantage of Eq. (34) is that it takes into account the explicit dependence of the matrix S on the atomic positions R, without using any cumbersome derivative of its inverse, as unavoidable in other methods [8,23,24], that are computationally much more expensive. This iteration scheme is not a Markov chain as the positions R at the next time t + ∆ depend not only on the actual time t but also on the previous ones t − ∆.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At variance of all previous attempts [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], we propose that an optimal way to get rid of different time scales is based on the use of first order Langevin dynamics:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%