2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3609869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio calculation of effective work functions for a TiN/HfO2/SiO2/Si transistor stack

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[35] The case of incoherent interfaces like in a relaxed buried semiconductor QD or a complex stack of metal oxide semiconductors can hardly be treated at the envelope function level. [44,51] DFT is a valuable tool in such cases. Effective mass or k.p approaches are still interesting to easily compute various bulk physical quantities like the density of states or the optical dielectric constants.…”
Section: Effective Mass Modeling Of Quantum Confinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35] The case of incoherent interfaces like in a relaxed buried semiconductor QD or a complex stack of metal oxide semiconductors can hardly be treated at the envelope function level. [44,51] DFT is a valuable tool in such cases. Effective mass or k.p approaches are still interesting to easily compute various bulk physical quantities like the density of states or the optical dielectric constants.…”
Section: Effective Mass Modeling Of Quantum Confinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,[31][32][33][34] The G 0 W 0 correction can also be used to correct the location of the valence bands for insulators and the Fermi energy for metals in relation to the electrostatic potential of a material, and has recently been shown to closely approach the effective work function for a complete gate stack. 22 Based upon the encouraging results obtained for Si/SiO 2 , 24,33 Si/HfO 2 34 and SiO 2 /HfO 2 22 interfaces, we used a G 0 W 0 correction hoping to provide results sufficiently close to experiment. The G 0 W 0 calculation is a perturbational approach which is generally used to correct the energy levels coming from a DFT calculation.…”
Section: B G 0 W 0 Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…[17][18][19] While many studies have been directed towards the building of new gate stacks, the specific HfO 2 /SiO 2 interface is only beginning to be well understood at the atomic scale, in relation to its structure and concerning the role of dopants. 2,8,12,13,[20][21][22][23][24] In order to render possible the theoretical study of the variability issue without including all possible structural factors that could be affected during the deposition processes or by the various thermal treatments, one has to carefully select the materials phases, interface orientations, chemistry of the interfaces, and dopants locations. As explained in detail in part III of this paper, we specifically deal with the variance of the orientation between monoclinic HfO 2 (m-HfO 2 ) and β-cristobalite SiO 2 (β-SiO 2 ) by constructing and calculating the VBO of low strain interfaces using ab initio methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it has limited predictive capability. A very recent work by Prodhomme et al 35 uses the band offset method to compute the EWF going beyond standard LDA-DFT. They considered the entire stack of a MOSFET involving Si/SiO 2 /HfO 2 /TiN.…”
Section: Effective Work Function Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach to computing the EWF is through the band offset method. 13,34,35 In this method, the EWF is obtained by subtracting the valence band offset between HfO 2 and the metal, from the experimental band gap of the HfO 2 , and then by adding the experimental electron affinity of the HfO 2 . However, this method suffers from the well known problem of the DFT, namely, the errors in the band structure (extracted from the bulk calculations on the materials forming the interface) as well as in the bandline up (obtained from the interface calculation).…”
Section: Effective Work Function Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%