2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00510.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(A,f): Choice with Frames1

Abstract: We develop a framework for modelling choice in the presence of framing effects. An extended choice function assigns a chosen element to every pair (A, f) where A is a set of alternatives, and f is a frame. A frame includes observable information that is irrelevant in the rational assessment of the alternatives, but nonetheless affects choice. We relate the new framework to the classical model of choice correspondence. Conditions are identified under which there exists either a transitive or a transitive and co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Another approach allows for context dependence by considering extended choice situations where behaviour can depend on unspecified ancillary conditions or frames (Salant and Rubinstein, ; Bernheim and Rangel, ). While information effects can explain some context dependence (Sen, ), they cannot explain many systematic violations of IIA (Tversky and Simonson, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Another approach allows for context dependence by considering extended choice situations where behaviour can depend on unspecified ancillary conditions or frames (Salant and Rubinstein, ; Bernheim and Rangel, ). While information effects can explain some context dependence (Sen, ), they cannot explain many systematic violations of IIA (Tversky and Simonson, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Salant and Rubinstein's (2008) terms we would say that c SCF (O|A) is an example of a salient consideration function. 22 Interestingly, this implies that violations of WARP can take place only when the DM mixes two or more frames O.…”
Section: Choice With Framesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since according to Rubinstein and Salant's (2006) domain the DM examines alternatives one by one, then it is impossible to infer the ranking between satisfactory alternatives. Salant and Rubinstein (2008) propose a framework called choice with frames according to which the choice function depends not only on the budget set, but also on some observable information, called frame, which is irrelevant from a standard viewpoint. Formally, a choice problem with frames is a pair (A, f), where A ∈ P(X) is a budget set and f ∈ F is a frame in the set of frames.…”
Section: Relationships With Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our experiment can be described in terms of the choice-with-frames model proposed by Salant and Rubinstein (2008) that formalises and generalises the concept of framing effects (Tversky and Kahneman 1981). Let X denote a grand set of multi-attribute alternatives and S a collection of non-empty subsets of X .…”
Section: The Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%