2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.22.20137547
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4S-DT: Self Supervised Super Sample Decomposition for Transfer learning with application to COVID-19 detection

Abstract: Due to the high availability of large-scale annotated image datasets, knowledge transfer from pre-trained models showed outstanding performance in medical image classification. However, building a robust image classification model for datasets with data irregularity or imbalanced classes can be a very challenging task, especially in the medical imaging domain. In this paper, we propose a novel deep convolutional neural network, we called Self Supervised Super Sample Decomposition for transfer learning (4S-DT) … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using 8 different Deep Learning Model [4] researchers found NasNet and MobileNet outperformed all the models and they used both CT image and X-ray images to evaluate their system.DenseNets concatenates output features rather than sum the output feature maps of the layer with the incoming feature maps.DenseNet outperformed than other models [18] having 85% sensitivity.In the following section, some other feature extraction methods adopted by the researchers are discussed elaborately. [4], [7], [10], [13], [14], [18], [20], [22], [27], [28], [31], [32], [38], [40], [41], [44], [ 47], [51], [61], [62], [66], [67], [71], [73], [74] 26…”
Section: Feature Extraction Methods For X-raymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using 8 different Deep Learning Model [4] researchers found NasNet and MobileNet outperformed all the models and they used both CT image and X-ray images to evaluate their system.DenseNets concatenates output features rather than sum the output feature maps of the layer with the incoming feature maps.DenseNet outperformed than other models [18] having 85% sensitivity.In the following section, some other feature extraction methods adopted by the researchers are discussed elaborately. [4], [7], [10], [13], [14], [18], [20], [22], [27], [28], [31], [32], [38], [40], [41], [44], [ 47], [51], [61], [62], [66], [67], [71], [73], [74] 26…”
Section: Feature Extraction Methods For X-raymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GoogLeNet [7], [27], [40], [44], [66], 5 [49], and a Capsule Network-based Framework (COVID-CAPS) [57].…”
Section: Feature Extraction Methods For X-raymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From both Fig. 4 [28] 153 N/A 203 N/A [11] 1126 N/A 938 N/A [12] 6000 N/A 6000 N/A [13] 247 N/A 178 N/A [14] NS NS NS N/A [74] N/A N/A 150 N/A [75] 75541 N/A 64771 N/A [76] 397 N/A 349 N/A [77] 195 N/A 275 N/A [18] 339 COVID-19 images, other lung disease images like Viral pneumonia ( [3], [25], [19], [46], [20]), Bacterial pneumonia ( [60], [19], [61], [62], [20], [63]), fungal pneumonia [64], SARS ( [65], [66], [67], [57]), MERS [66], Influenza [10], Tuberculosis ( [61], [67], [68]) and images of healthy people. The distribution of different types of lung disease or normal images and the number of CT images used by papers are illustrated in Table 2.…”
Section: X-ray Image Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%