2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

110th Anniversary: Theory of Activity Coefficients for Lithium Salts in Aqueous and Nonaqueous Solvents and in Solvent Mixtures

Abstract: On the basis of work by Bernard and Blum [Bernard, O.; Blum, L. Binding Mean Spherical Approximation for Pairing Ions: An Exponential Approximation and Thermodynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 4746-4754], Barthel et al. [Barthel, J.; Krienke, H.; Holovko, M.; Kapko, V.; Protsykevich, I. The Application of the Associative Mean Spherical Approximation in the Theory of Nonaqueous Electrolyte Solutions. Condens. Matter Phys.2000, 3, 23], and Simonin et al. [Simonin, J.-P.; Bernard, O.; Blum, L. Real Ionic Solutio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(193 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, ion/solvent interactions hold more solvent molecules in the solution phase, effectively decreasing the solvent's vapor pressure [29] and causing a corresponding increase in the solute's activity coefficient, leading to a consequent increase in !. These competing trends are also substantiated by more recent electrolyte theories such as the binding mean spherical approximation [30]. Note that the crossing points where !…”
Section: Thermodynamic Factorsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Second, ion/solvent interactions hold more solvent molecules in the solution phase, effectively decreasing the solvent's vapor pressure [29] and causing a corresponding increase in the solute's activity coefficient, leading to a consequent increase in !. These competing trends are also substantiated by more recent electrolyte theories such as the binding mean spherical approximation [30]. Note that the crossing points where !…”
Section: Thermodynamic Factorsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Again, this trend does not match previous results or physical intuition which would dictate a thermodynamic factor of 1 in the ideal dilute concentration limit, an initial decrease below 1 in the thermodynamic factor for dilute solutions, and an increase in thermodynamic factor above 1 for solutions in the semi-concentrated regime. [37]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although existing electrolyte models have been addressed for this purpose, the application was mainly restricted to aqueous systems such as in Sadowski’s group. , This underlines the urgent need for the further development of thermodynamic electrolyte models. Recently, electrolyte models have been suggested for water-poor conditions, especially in the Held/Sadowski, de Hemptinne, Kontogeorgis, and Smirnova research groups (refs ). Still, these are restricted either to water solvent , or to only one salt, or they require complete reparameterization or even solvent-dependent parameters .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, electrolyte models have been suggested for water-poor conditions, especially in the Held/Sadowski, de Hemptinne, Kontogeorgis, and Smirnova research groups (refs ). Still, these are restricted either to water solvent , or to only one salt, or they require complete reparameterization or even solvent-dependent parameters . This points to a lack of physical consistency, a natural matter of fact in complex solutions overlain by numerous single effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%