2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hysteroscopy as a Primary Tool in Exploration and Treatment of Infertility: Single Center Experience in Western Romania

Abstract: (1) Background: Infertility is a disease that affects millions of individuals worldwide. Intrauterine lesions are common in infertile women, hysteroscopy being considered the gold standard for assessing them, even if in routine clinical practice indirect imaging techniques are the first-line investigative tools. The aim of the study was to evaluate hysteroscopic findings among women with unexplained infertility and to analyze fertility outcomes after operative hysteroscopy; (2) Methods: a retrospective cohort … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing the relationship of findings in hysteroscopy, no statistically significant difference was found in the presence or absence of pathology, with the type of infertility (Table 2). 12,[14][15][16] The average time of infertility was 5.7±3.2 years; these results are comparable to those of other studies in Turkey, by Eskalen (4.5 years), but different from those reported by Farag: 7.6 years and by Ali: 2.8 years, in their researches on Egyptian women. 9,15,17 In our analysis, primary infertility had a frequency of 79.1% and secondary infertility 20.9%, similar to data by several authors, where primary infertility was also more prevalent than secondary: Koskas (73.4% vs. 26.6%), El Huseiny (63.4% vs 36.5%), Farag (88% vs 12%), Citu (67.7% vs 32.3%), Ali (70% vs. 30%); unlike from the Pansky data, whose frequency of both types of infertility was similar (48% vs. 52%) and also different to that reported by Emeka, in whose study population in Nigerian women, secondary infertility was more frequent (20% vs. 80%).…”
Section: Treatment Of Lesionssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When comparing the relationship of findings in hysteroscopy, no statistically significant difference was found in the presence or absence of pathology, with the type of infertility (Table 2). 12,[14][15][16] The average time of infertility was 5.7±3.2 years; these results are comparable to those of other studies in Turkey, by Eskalen (4.5 years), but different from those reported by Farag: 7.6 years and by Ali: 2.8 years, in their researches on Egyptian women. 9,15,17 In our analysis, primary infertility had a frequency of 79.1% and secondary infertility 20.9%, similar to data by several authors, where primary infertility was also more prevalent than secondary: Koskas (73.4% vs. 26.6%), El Huseiny (63.4% vs 36.5%), Farag (88% vs 12%), Citu (67.7% vs 32.3%), Ali (70% vs. 30%); unlike from the Pansky data, whose frequency of both types of infertility was similar (48% vs. 52%) and also different to that reported by Emeka, in whose study population in Nigerian women, secondary infertility was more frequent (20% vs. 80%).…”
Section: Treatment Of Lesionssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…9,10 The prevalence of abnormal findings in the uterine cavity diagnosed by hysteroscopy in infertile women is reported between 19 to 62%. [11][12][13] The aim of our study was to describe hysteroscopic findings, the frequency of alterations in the uterine cavity and the type of instrument used for treatment of structural lesions in a group of Mexican infertile women; and secondarily to compare the relationship of the positive findings in hysteroscopy with the type of infertility (primary and secondary).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The COVID-19 pandemic's detrimental impacts on maternal and perinatal health are not confined to the disease's direct morbidity and death. We expect that Romanian pregnant women who are left behind for prenatal monitoring and treatment as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic's limitations [15][16][17][18] would have worse pregnancy outcomes, as it was recently demonstrated in a global analysis concluding that maternal and fetal outcomes have deteriorated as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, with an increase in maternal deaths, stillbirths, and maternal depression [19][20][21][22]. As growing concerns during the pandemic affect medical workers and mothers, we believe that anemia during pregnancy can be easily overlooked in these times, as much as it is still an understudied topic in correlation with COVID-19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citu et al 16 In a review of published case series, 47 percent of infertile patients became pregnant after hysteroscopy polypectomy, compared to 42 percent of infertile patients with normal endometrial cavities. Shokeir et al 17 suggested that women who can't get pregnant should always get a diagnostic hysteroscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%