2021
DOI: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_105_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine-retained suture material causing pelvic inflammatory disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This small retrospective study shows that in well-selected cases, hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation is a safe and efficacious method of treating CSP which can be offered in a single setting. [ 15 16 17 ] There are several in-built features to reduce blood loss including the administration of tranexamic acid at induction, cervical infiltration with pitressin before inserting the hysteroscope, hydro dissection during gestational sac dislodgement, and the option of inserting a Foley catheter postoperatively. It has advantages over simple dilatation and evacuation in that it allows localization of the pregnancy and visualization to ensure completeness, especially if a grasper or scissors are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This small retrospective study shows that in well-selected cases, hysteroscopic-guided suction evacuation is a safe and efficacious method of treating CSP which can be offered in a single setting. [ 15 16 17 ] There are several in-built features to reduce blood loss including the administration of tranexamic acid at induction, cervical infiltration with pitressin before inserting the hysteroscope, hydro dissection during gestational sac dislodgement, and the option of inserting a Foley catheter postoperatively. It has advantages over simple dilatation and evacuation in that it allows localization of the pregnancy and visualization to ensure completeness, especially if a grasper or scissors are required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%