2022
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.857458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HyProCure for Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot: What Affects the Outcome

Abstract: BackgroundThe high success rate, minimal invasion, and safety of subtalar arthroereisis (SA) have made it a primary mode of surgical management for pediatric flexible flatfoot. The HyProCure procedure is a new surgery for SA, However, very few available studies reported the therapeutic effects of the HyProCure procedure, especially in pediatric flexible flatfoot. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the HyProCure procedure for pediatric flexible flatfoo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, Graham et al in their study, in a group of 78 adult patients treated with the HyProCure ® implant, recorded an average MFS score of 88 [2]. In another study conducted by Chen et al, 69 pediatric flexible flatfoot patients (107 feet) treated with the HyProCure ® implant reported a mean MFS score of 90.4 after surgery [26]. As noted by Chen et al, improper trial sizing could lead to a larger size selection, thus preventing the ideal depth of implant placement, which is a risk factor for unsatisfactory post-operative efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In comparison, Graham et al in their study, in a group of 78 adult patients treated with the HyProCure ® implant, recorded an average MFS score of 88 [2]. In another study conducted by Chen et al, 69 pediatric flexible flatfoot patients (107 feet) treated with the HyProCure ® implant reported a mean MFS score of 90.4 after surgery [26]. As noted by Chen et al, improper trial sizing could lead to a larger size selection, thus preventing the ideal depth of implant placement, which is a risk factor for unsatisfactory post-operative efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%