2022
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01427-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypoxia and HIF-1 Trigger Marek’s Disease Virus Reactivation in Lymphoma-Derived Latently Infected T Lymphocytes

Abstract: Latency is a hallmark of herpesviruses, allowing them to persist into their host without virions production. Acute exposure to hypoxia (below 3% O 2 ) was identified as a trigger of latent-to-lytic switch (reactivation) for human oncogenic gamma-herpesviruses (KSHV and EBV). Therefore, we hypothesized that hypoxia could also induce reactivation of Marek’s disease virus (MDV), sharing biological properties with EBV and KSHV (notably oncogenic properties), into lymphocytes. Acute exposure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell viability was measured using DAPI stain exclusion to differentiate live from dead cells ( Figure 2A ). The cell viability of the control (41°C) group for each cell line was consistently lower at 8 h post-treatment (hpt), likely due to hypoxia, serum starvation, and low temperature during Histopaque purification ( 16 ). When comparing each treatment for KJ1063, sodium butyrate (NaB) significantly reduced cell viability from 86.8 ± 1.0% at 8 hpt down to 77.3 ± 1.4, 60.3 ± 0.4, and 61.9 ± 1.5% at 24, 36, and 48 hpt, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cell viability was measured using DAPI stain exclusion to differentiate live from dead cells ( Figure 2A ). The cell viability of the control (41°C) group for each cell line was consistently lower at 8 h post-treatment (hpt), likely due to hypoxia, serum starvation, and low temperature during Histopaque purification ( 16 ). When comparing each treatment for KJ1063, sodium butyrate (NaB) significantly reduced cell viability from 86.8 ± 1.0% at 8 hpt down to 77.3 ± 1.4, 60.3 ± 0.4, and 61.9 ± 1.5% at 24, 36, and 48 hpt, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, increased cellular stress through histone modification is suspected to result in induced apoptosis ( 59 ) and G2/M cell cycle arrest ( 60 ), likely resulting in virus escape (reactivation) from the cell. However, chemical treatment is only one of the multiple mechanisms to induce reactivation or fully productive virus replication, including UV light, serum starvation, temperature changes, and hypoxia ( 16 , 23 , 24 , 61 , 62 ). The core body temperature of chickens is approximately 41°C, while the surface body temperature can fluctuate in ambient temperatures and range from 20 to 40°C ( 36 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assessed whether the two ulvans formulations and the VitComp control could have an effect on the maintenance of MDV latency and viral reactivation (corresponding to the late cytolytic phase of infection) in vitro. To this end, we used the 3867 K cells, a lymphoblastoid cell line that expresses the green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused to the tegument protein UL47 upon reactivation, as described previously [ 27 , 28 ]. The 3867 K cells were treated with the vitamin complex, Searup® and ulvans at different concentrations and the rate of viral reactivation (GFP positive cells within the viable cell population) was evaluated by cytometry upon 96 h of treatment (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All media supplemented with the different treatments doses were renewed after 48 h of culture. In a second set of experiment, the 3867 K cells were treated with 2 ml/l of VitComp, Searup® or ulvans extract in combination with 0.5 mM of sodium butyrate (NaBut; Sigma-Aldrich), a histone deacetylase inhibitor known to trigger herpesvirus reactivation [ 28 , 51 , 52 ]. Cells were treated for 24 to 96 h depending on the test performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%