2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2013.6631173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypothesis testing framework for active object detection

Abstract: One of the central problems in computer vision is the detection of semantically important objects and the estimation of their pose. Most of the work in object detection has been based on single image processing and its performance is limited by occlusions and ambiguity in appearance and geometry. This paper proposes an active approach to object detection by controlling the point of view of a mobile depth camera. When an initial static detection phase identifies an object of interest, several hypotheses are mad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to [9], we use mutual information to decide the NBV. However, we consider this 1 The model is precisely a convolutional DBM where all the connections are undirected, while ours is a convolutional DBN. problem at the precise voxel level allowing us to infer how voxels in a 3D region would contribute to the reduction of recognition uncertainty.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to [9], we use mutual information to decide the NBV. However, we consider this 1 The model is precisely a convolutional DBM where all the connections are undirected, while ours is a convolutional DBN. problem at the precise voxel level allowing us to infer how voxels in a 3D region would contribute to the reduction of recognition uncertainty.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However this multi-view problem is intrinsically 3D in nature. Atanasov et al, [1,2] implement the idea in real world robots, but they assume that there is only one object associated with each class reducing their problem to instance-level recognition with no intra-class variance. Similar to [9], we use mutual information to decide the NBV.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active information acquisition is a challenging problem with diverse applications including robotics tasks [14], [15], [16], [17]. It is a sequential decision making problem where agents are tasked with acquiring information about a certain process of interest (target).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hager and Wegbreit (2011) demonstrate the utility of considering a prior 3-D scene model and its potential evolution over scenes. Using this observation as a premise, active perception approaches (e.g., Eidenberger and Scharinger (2010); Velez et al (2012); Atanasov et al (2013)) seek the next best view (camera pose) where previously-occluded objects may be visible, typically by formulating the problem as a partially-observable Markov decision process. Because the focus is on planning instead of estimation, this line of work is complementary to the world modeling problem, which considers estimation using measurements from an uncontrolled, arbitrary collection of camera poses.…”
Section: Semantic World Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%