2014
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1407.5525
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypothesis Testing For Network Data in Functional Neuroimaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work considers the scenario of observing M graphs, represented as adjacency matrices, A (1) , A (2) , . .…”
Section: Statistical Connectome Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This work considers the scenario of observing M graphs, represented as adjacency matrices, A (1) , A (2) , . .…”
Section: Statistical Connectome Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input: Adjacency matrices A (1) , A (2) , For a given dimension d we consider the estimator lowrank d ( Ā) defined as the best rank-d positive-semidefinite approximation of Ā. Let Ŝ be a diagonal matrix with non-increasing entries along the diagonal corresponding to the largest d eigenvalues of Ā and let Û have columns given by the corresponding eigenvectors.…”
Section: Algorithm 2 Algorithm To Compute Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple other methods have also been developed for quantifying differences across populations. Ginestet et al [2014] develop a central limit theorem for graph laplacians, allowing them to derive pivotal quantities and formally test for differences in pairs of networks. Zalesky, Fornito and Bullmore [2010] propose a network-based statistic to control the family-wise error rate when performing mass-univariate testing across all edges.…”
Section: Mixed Neighborhood Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the general parametric framework, G ∼ f ∈ F = {f θ : θ ∈ Θ}, and selecting a principled and productive estimator θ for the unknown graph parameter θ given a sample of graphs {G (1) , • • • , G (m) } is one of the most foundational and essential tasks, facilitating subsequent inference. For example, Ginestet et al [2014] proposes a method to test for a difference between the networks of two groups of subjects in functional neuroimaging; while hypothesis testing is the ultimate goal, estimation is a key intermediate step. We propose a widely-applicable, robust, low-rank estimation procedure for a collection of weighted graphs.…”
Section: Background and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%