2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypotheses About the Relationship of Cognition With Psychopathology Should be Tested by Embedding Them Into Empirical Priors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the relation between dogmatism and a general tendency to seek out less information can be formalized as follows: Here, describes the relation between dogmatism and , while represents individual variation in this parameter that is not explained by dogmatism. If the credible interval of does not include zero, this indicates a significant association between dogmatism and ( 32 ). In what follows, we report 95% credible intervals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the relation between dogmatism and a general tendency to seek out less information can be formalized as follows: Here, describes the relation between dogmatism and , while represents individual variation in this parameter that is not explained by dogmatism. If the credible interval of does not include zero, this indicates a significant association between dogmatism and ( 32 ). In what follows, we report 95% credible intervals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, parameters obtained through such an approach can then be correlated with an external measure of differences between individuals. However, this procedure is suboptimal because it assumes no variability in the mean of the population in the initial model fit, possibly distorting or minimizing potential relationships between the parameter and external factors ( 32 ). To maintain the advantages of hierarchical fitting while avoiding such pitfalls regarding individual differences, here we employ a procedure recently prescribed by Moutoussis et al ( 32 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These infer the characteristics of each individual not only from the data they provided, but also from the specific population from which they are drawn. Clinically informed model-fitting allowed (yet did not force) empirical priors over cognitive parameters like learning rates to be informed by clinical data, here BFNE scores (Moutoussis et al, 2018). It thus allowed more accurate estimation of the correlation between parameters and FNE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional hierarchical modelling reduces noise in parameter estimates, but we have found that empirical (population) priors which do not take adequately into account the possible correlations with external measures can increase the rates of Type 1 or Type 2 error, in subsequent correlation analyses with unmodelled psychometric measures (Moutoussis, Hopkins, & Dolan, 2018). Here, incorporating key psychological hypotheses in the model-fitting can give more accurate estimates of the relationship between model parameters and BFNE scores.…”
Section: Modelling the Relation To Fear Of Negative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, inference regarding subgroups is automatically incorporated within this framework through the regression models and therefore does not require multiple fittings to different subgroups (Ahn et al, 2017). Fitting the model separately for different groups and then performing a comparison between the estimated parameters could be problematic in that it may introduce biases and false positives (Moutoussis, Hopkins, & Dolan, 2018). Similarly, in our simulation study, fitting the model separately for each individual resulted in substantial and systematic bias for parameter estimates across individuals, confounding the interpretation of these individual differences with respect to biological or psychological covariates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%