“…Acquisition of the conditioned NM response has been demonstrated to provide an excellent model for separating learning from performance variables (Harvey and Welsh 1996) and is acknowledged to provide an unambiguous measure of associative learning (Harvey 1987). We found that systemic (IV) administration of the NO donor SNP retarded (Du et al 1995) and IP injection of the NOS inhibitor L-NAME enhanced (Du and Harvey 1996) the acquisition of CRs. These alterations in learning occurred in the absence of any effects on performance variables or non-associative processes (Du et al 1995;Du and Harvey 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We found that systemic (IV) administration of the NO donor SNP retarded (Du et al 1995) and IP injection of the NOS inhibitor L-NAME enhanced (Du and Harvey 1996) the acquisition of CRs. These alterations in learning occurred in the absence of any effects on performance variables or non-associative processes (Du et al 1995;Du and Harvey 1996). The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the effects of L-NAME and SNP were due to their direct central effects on brain NO.…”
Production of NO within the brain by neuronal NOS normally acts to retard associative learning presumably by decreasing excitability within neuronal circuits involved in the acquisition of the classically conditioned NM reflex.
“…Acquisition of the conditioned NM response has been demonstrated to provide an excellent model for separating learning from performance variables (Harvey and Welsh 1996) and is acknowledged to provide an unambiguous measure of associative learning (Harvey 1987). We found that systemic (IV) administration of the NO donor SNP retarded (Du et al 1995) and IP injection of the NOS inhibitor L-NAME enhanced (Du and Harvey 1996) the acquisition of CRs. These alterations in learning occurred in the absence of any effects on performance variables or non-associative processes (Du et al 1995;Du and Harvey 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We found that systemic (IV) administration of the NO donor SNP retarded (Du et al 1995) and IP injection of the NOS inhibitor L-NAME enhanced (Du and Harvey 1996) the acquisition of CRs. These alterations in learning occurred in the absence of any effects on performance variables or non-associative processes (Du et al 1995;Du and Harvey 1996). The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the effects of L-NAME and SNP were due to their direct central effects on brain NO.…”
Production of NO within the brain by neuronal NOS normally acts to retard associative learning presumably by decreasing excitability within neuronal circuits involved in the acquisition of the classically conditioned NM reflex.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.