2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53348-3_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypogene Speleogenesis in the Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico and Texas, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the Laramide Orogeny is considered as a period of uplift in our study area, there is little known about the extent of Laramide uplift and the pre‐Laramide landscape. Some reports suggest that the surface of the region was uplifted as much as 1 km during the Laramide, but the absolute timing of the remaining 2 km of uplift is less well known (Chapin & Cather, ; DuChene & Cunningham, ; Hill, ; Horak, ). Overall, our model of spar cave speleogenesis and measured depth results indicate that the paleo‐surface of the Guadalupe Mountains and Delaware Basin region was 500 ± 250 m above the spar horizon, and this, along with nearby occurrences of Cretaceous strata (Figure ) and lack of tectonic evidence for a strong compressional regime during the Laramide, supports a relatively low‐lying terrane ~≤1 km above sea level from 180 to 28 Ma, after which the Guadalupe tectonic block rose an additional 2 km above the adjacent salt basin graben on the west end near the fault zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the Laramide Orogeny is considered as a period of uplift in our study area, there is little known about the extent of Laramide uplift and the pre‐Laramide landscape. Some reports suggest that the surface of the region was uplifted as much as 1 km during the Laramide, but the absolute timing of the remaining 2 km of uplift is less well known (Chapin & Cather, ; DuChene & Cunningham, ; Hill, ; Horak, ). Overall, our model of spar cave speleogenesis and measured depth results indicate that the paleo‐surface of the Guadalupe Mountains and Delaware Basin region was 500 ± 250 m above the spar horizon, and this, along with nearby occurrences of Cretaceous strata (Figure ) and lack of tectonic evidence for a strong compressional regime during the Laramide, supports a relatively low‐lying terrane ~≤1 km above sea level from 180 to 28 Ma, after which the Guadalupe tectonic block rose an additional 2 km above the adjacent salt basin graben on the west end near the fault zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One model measured 1 km of relative Guadalupe block uplift from 12 Ma to present coeval with Rio Grande rifting (Polyak et al, ). Other models suggest that the area arose primarily during the Laramide Orogeny (DuChene & Cunningham, ; Eaton, ) or during the Oligocene‐Miocene (King, ). Pre‐Laramide crustal thickening has been suggested based on petrographic evidence (Scholle, Ulmer, & Melim, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cave formed in carbonate rocks of the Permian Capitan Reef Complex in the Guadalupe Mountain uplift through hypogene sulfuric acid speleogenesis (DuChene, 2000;Hill, 2000a, b). During the Miocene and Pliocene, hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), derived in part from microbial activity in hydrocarbon reservoirs in the adjacent Delaware Basin, mixed with oxygenated waters of the karst aquifer to form sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) that caused extensive carbonate dissolution and cave origin (Hill, 1987(Hill, , 2000aJagnow et al, 2000;Palmer & Palmer, 2000;Barton, 2013;DuChene et al, 2017). Substantial deposits of gypsum (hydrated CaSO 4 ) were left behind as a byproduct and their secondary dissolution and reprecipitation led to the formation of a wide variety of speleothems (Davis, 2000;Palmer & Palmer, 2000;Polyak & Provencio, 2001;Palmer, 2006).…”
Section: Reworking Of Hydrothermal Mineral Deposits By H 2 S-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process was first proposed by Principi [2] and is used to describe the formation of caves via dissolution of limestone by sulfidic groundwaters. Among the most well-known and investigated SAS caves are those from Guadalupe Mountains, USA [3,4], Movile, Romania [5], Frasassi, Italy [6,7], Cueva de Villa Luz, Mexico [8,9], and Lower Kane Cave, USA [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%