2020
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000022721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma

Abstract: Background: The standard treatment for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is radiotherapy, although conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) may not be in the best interest of the patient. Instead, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) may shorten the treatment period and reduce related costs for this treatment, which is typically palliative in nature. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated survival outcomes among patients who received HFRT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypofractionated radiotherapy with temozolomide did not improve survival outcomes and accompanied higher hematologic toxicity compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy. A recently published meta-analysis performed to overcome the small sample size of previous studies included 4 articles, involving 88 patients undergoing hypofractionated radiotherapy and 96 patients undergoing conventional fractionation radiotherapy [ 31 ]. It revealed that hypofractionated and conventional fractionation radiotherapy provided comparable OS (HR=1.07, 95% CI: 0.77–1.47) and PFS (HR= 1.04, 95% CI: 0.75–1.45) and had similar toxicity profiles.…”
Section: Radiotherapy Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypofractionated radiotherapy with temozolomide did not improve survival outcomes and accompanied higher hematologic toxicity compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy. A recently published meta-analysis performed to overcome the small sample size of previous studies included 4 articles, involving 88 patients undergoing hypofractionated radiotherapy and 96 patients undergoing conventional fractionation radiotherapy [ 31 ]. It revealed that hypofractionated and conventional fractionation radiotherapy provided comparable OS (HR=1.07, 95% CI: 0.77–1.47) and PFS (HR= 1.04, 95% CI: 0.75–1.45) and had similar toxicity profiles.…”
Section: Radiotherapy Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis by Trone and colleagues in first line GB revealed that hypofractionation lead to comparable survival outcomes-overall survival and progression free survival-with the benefit of a shortened duration of treatment [6]. Similar conclusions have been reported in the elderly GB [7] and paediatric diffuse midline glioma patient populations [8]. While hypofractionated RT regimens have been examined in the clinic, the mechanism of action from differential fractionated regimens are often not explored preclinically to elucidate wherein we may better reduce delayed neurological symptoms associated with radiotoxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Hyperfractionated RT has shown potential in improving clinical management by caregivers and has a significant positive impact on the quality of life for patients with DMG [ 8 , 15 ]. In contrast, a study by Park et al (2020) compared hyperfractionated therapy with standard RT and found similar survival outcomes for patients with DMG [ 62 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%