2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(03)00077-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for poor prognosis malignant glioma: matched pair survival analysis with MRC controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
40
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This change probably reflects the attempts of many clinical researchers to identify hypofractionated schemes suitable for palliation for poorprognosis patients (17)(18)(19)(20). The Neuro Oncology Disease Group of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative states that "this option would be particularly appropriate for patients who are both older and with poor performance status" (12).…”
Section: Pattern-of-practice Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This change probably reflects the attempts of many clinical researchers to identify hypofractionated schemes suitable for palliation for poorprognosis patients (17)(18)(19)(20). The Neuro Oncology Disease Group of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative states that "this option would be particularly appropriate for patients who are both older and with poor performance status" (12).…”
Section: Pattern-of-practice Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients represents more than half of our series, and the evaluation of NPS before an appropriate treatment option is chosen is therefore of the utmost importance. Recent reports, in fact, suggest that, especially for poor-prognosis HGG, "quality adjusted survival" or "good quality survival" (strongly linked with neurologic status) is a better measure of outcome than uncorrected survival (30,31).…”
Section: Survival Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hulshof et al [28] found that the median survival for patients treated with 40 Gy/ 8 fractions or 28 Gy/ 4 fractions, were 7-and 5.6-months, respectively. McAleese et al [30] in a comparative study of hypofractionated radiation (using 30 Gy/6 fractions / 2 weeks) to GBM patients versus conventional method of 60 Gy /30 fractions /6 weeks found that median survival was higher among the conventional arm but was not statistically significant. Chang et al [ 29] in a higher dose schedule (50 Gy/20 fractions at 2.5 Gy per fraction) found that the median survival was 7 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These results are in keeping with some of the empirical results on hypofractionated therapy. For example, the work of McAleese et al (29) compared an accelerated hypofractionated protocol consisting of 30 Gy in 6 fractions to matched controls receiving a standard 60 Gy/30 fraction protocol, and found that although the hypofractionated protocol had a palliative benefit, it showed a shorter median survival of 2.5-4.5 months compared to the standard protocol. Of course, the objective of the present study is not to rigorously compare hypofractionated to standard protocols, but the simulation is presented to show the utility of the current model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%