2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11557-006-0073-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypocrea phyllostachydis and its Trichoderma anamorph, a new bambusicolous species from France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, 88 taxa have been recently redefined by combination of molecular and phenetic tools (Table 3). Four taxa introduced by Chaverri et al(2004) (Table 4) still lack phylogenetic analysis. Among the 88, 14 anamorph-teleomorph relationships have been demonstrated and thus represent holomorphs, 49 have been described in Hypocrea, while the remaining 25 were described as Trichoderma.…”
Section: How Can Species Of Trichoderma Be Identified?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…So far, 88 taxa have been recently redefined by combination of molecular and phenetic tools (Table 3). Four taxa introduced by Chaverri et al(2004) (Table 4) still lack phylogenetic analysis. Among the 88, 14 anamorph-teleomorph relationships have been demonstrated and thus represent holomorphs, 49 have been described in Hypocrea, while the remaining 25 were described as Trichoderma.…”
Section: How Can Species Of Trichoderma Be Identified?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…croceum), H. pilulifera, H. parapilulifera, H. stellata, H. minutispora/T. minutisporum and H. laciwombatensis , whereas the latter includes H. citrina, H. lactea, H. sulphurea and H. pulvinata (Chaverri et al, 2004;4 Overton, personal communication).…”
Section: How Can Species Of Trichoderma Be Identified?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The characterization of Trichoderma isolates into species aggregates were based on cultural and morphological characters (BISSETT 1984(BISSETT , 1991(BISSETT , 1992BISSETT et al 2003;CHAVERRI et al 2001CHAVERRI et al , 2004SAMUELS 2002, 2003;RIFAI 1969;WEBSTER 1964;WEBSTER and RIFAI 1968). The other co-existing soil fungi were also identi-fied according to the descriptions by BARRON (1972), DOMSCH et al (1980), ELLIS (1971), NELSON et al (1983), PITT (1979), andSUBRAMANIAN (1970).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Soil Micro Fungal Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%