2013
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypocomplementemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Impact on the Risk of Infectious Complications

Abstract: The usefulness of monitoring of complement levels in predicting the occurrence of infection in kidney transplant (KT) recipients remains largely unknown. We prospectively assessed serum complement levels (C3 and C4) at baseline and at months 1 and 6 in 270 patients undergoing KT. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for infection in each posttransplant period were estimated by Cox regression. The prevalence of C3 hypocomplementemia progressively decreased from 21.5% at baseline to 11.6% at month 6 (p = 0.017), wherea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The utility of this strategy has been shown in a prospective study of 270 kidney transplant recipients, in which the presence of C3 hypocomplementemia (serum levels <83.0 mg dl −1 ) at month 1 was as an independent risk factor for the subsequent occurrence of overall and bacterial infection (hazard ratios of 1.9 and 2.1, respectively). 35 Comparable findings have been reported for liver 36 and heart transplant recipients. 37 Unfortunately, the only intervention that seems feasible in a patient with low complement levels consists of decreasing immunosuppression, which in turn could increase the risk of graft rejection.…”
Section: Non-pathogen-specific Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The utility of this strategy has been shown in a prospective study of 270 kidney transplant recipients, in which the presence of C3 hypocomplementemia (serum levels <83.0 mg dl −1 ) at month 1 was as an independent risk factor for the subsequent occurrence of overall and bacterial infection (hazard ratios of 1.9 and 2.1, respectively). 35 Comparable findings have been reported for liver 36 and heart transplant recipients. 37 Unfortunately, the only intervention that seems feasible in a patient with low complement levels consists of decreasing immunosuppression, which in turn could increase the risk of graft rejection.…”
Section: Non-pathogen-specific Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Finally, we did not collect any parameter to define the “net state of immunosuppression” such as peripheral lymphocyte subpopulations, serum immunoglobulins, and serum complement that could have influenced predisposition to and outcome of the infectious complications in our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased susceptibility to both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial infection have been described with C3 deficiency. 27,28 Osteoblasts can be stimulated to produce C3 by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. 29 In culture experiments when anti-C3 antibody was used, osteoclast formation was greatly inhibited. 30 There has been no evidence for cleavage of C3 in either osteoblasts or osteoclasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%