Abstract:Background/aim: The mechanism of edema formation in nephrotic syndrome is still poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the volume status in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) and to emphasize the importance of echocardiography in demonstrating of volume changes.Materials and methods: Thirty-two SSNS patients and 30 healthy children were enrolled in this study. The volume statuses of patients were evaluated by clinical and laboratory features, including fractional sodium excretion (FENa)… Show more
“…However, in phase 2 of their study, the FeNa% criterion for the volume status was modi ed and patients with FeNa% of < 0.2% were identi ed with volume contraction which we have applied in addition to clinical assessment to differentiate edema types. In the current work,73.3% of the studied patients were non-hypovolemic; the same observation was noted by Buyukavci and colleagues [7] who reported that 75% of their patients were non-hypovolemic and another study also in 2015, by Ozdemir [9] studied NS subgroups (relapse-edematous, relapse-edema free and remission), were compared. They found nonsigni cant difference between groups as regard to IVCCI.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Some literatures relied on the presence or absence of hypovolemic symptoms and signs [4] or radioactive labeling techniques [5]. Later researches explored the roles of inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) and left atrial diameter (LAD) assessed by echocardiography (ECHO) [6,7] and over hydration (OH) value assessed by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) technique such as body composition monitor (BCM) [8] for volume burden assessment. IVCCI has strong correlation to central venous pressure so it decreases with increased intra vascular volume and have been widely used for volume status assessment in hemodialysis and critically ill patients and less frequently in INS [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Donmez et al; [6] studied the value of IVCCI, to determine the volume load in children with minimal lesion nephrotic syndrome and noted that IVCCI in nephrotic edematous patients was less than nephrotic non-edematous group and healthy control group, indicating hypervolemic state in edematous patients. On the other hand, In 2015, Buyukavci and his coworkers[7] studied SSNS children versus healthy control; IVCCI didn't differ among both groups. Furthermore, IVCCI was not signi cantly different between hypovolemic and nonhypovolemic subgroups within the active NS group.…”
Evaluating the volume status in children with Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is mandatory to guide treatment and avoid unnecessary possibly hazardous albumin use. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the available tools used for volume status assessment and differentiating type of edema in children with INS. Sixty children with active INS were included and subdivided into hypovolemic and non-hypovolemic groups based on fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa%) and clinical assessment. All patients were studied for Inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI), plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentration and Body composition monitor (BCM). Forty-four patients (77.3%) had non-hypovolemic and 16 (26.7%) had hypovolemic states. Plasma ANP levels didn’t differ between hypovolemic and non-hypovolemic subgroups. IVCCI was higher in hypovolemic group (p<0.001) with sensitivity 87.5% and specificity 81.8% for hypovolemia detection while BCM-over hydration (BCM-OH) values were higher in non-hypovolemic group (p=0.04) with sensitivity= 68.2% and specificity =75% for detection of hypervolemia. FeNa% showed negative significant correlation with IVCCI (r= -0.578, p <0.001) and positive significant correlation with BCM-OH (r= 0.33, p=0.018), while FeNa% showed non-significant correlation to plasma ANP concentration (p=0.25). Conclusion: Non-hypovolemic edema is more frequent in edematous INS children than hypovolemic states. IVCCI is a reliable non-invasive bedside tool for evaluating volume status in INS children and is superior to BCM while plasma ANP levels can’t discriminate type of edema in INS.
“…However, in phase 2 of their study, the FeNa% criterion for the volume status was modi ed and patients with FeNa% of < 0.2% were identi ed with volume contraction which we have applied in addition to clinical assessment to differentiate edema types. In the current work,73.3% of the studied patients were non-hypovolemic; the same observation was noted by Buyukavci and colleagues [7] who reported that 75% of their patients were non-hypovolemic and another study also in 2015, by Ozdemir [9] studied NS subgroups (relapse-edematous, relapse-edema free and remission), were compared. They found nonsigni cant difference between groups as regard to IVCCI.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Some literatures relied on the presence or absence of hypovolemic symptoms and signs [4] or radioactive labeling techniques [5]. Later researches explored the roles of inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) and left atrial diameter (LAD) assessed by echocardiography (ECHO) [6,7] and over hydration (OH) value assessed by bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) technique such as body composition monitor (BCM) [8] for volume burden assessment. IVCCI has strong correlation to central venous pressure so it decreases with increased intra vascular volume and have been widely used for volume status assessment in hemodialysis and critically ill patients and less frequently in INS [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Donmez et al; [6] studied the value of IVCCI, to determine the volume load in children with minimal lesion nephrotic syndrome and noted that IVCCI in nephrotic edematous patients was less than nephrotic non-edematous group and healthy control group, indicating hypervolemic state in edematous patients. On the other hand, In 2015, Buyukavci and his coworkers[7] studied SSNS children versus healthy control; IVCCI didn't differ among both groups. Furthermore, IVCCI was not signi cantly different between hypovolemic and nonhypovolemic subgroups within the active NS group.…”
Evaluating the volume status in children with Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is mandatory to guide treatment and avoid unnecessary possibly hazardous albumin use. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the available tools used for volume status assessment and differentiating type of edema in children with INS. Sixty children with active INS were included and subdivided into hypovolemic and non-hypovolemic groups based on fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa%) and clinical assessment. All patients were studied for Inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI), plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentration and Body composition monitor (BCM). Forty-four patients (77.3%) had non-hypovolemic and 16 (26.7%) had hypovolemic states. Plasma ANP levels didn’t differ between hypovolemic and non-hypovolemic subgroups. IVCCI was higher in hypovolemic group (p<0.001) with sensitivity 87.5% and specificity 81.8% for hypovolemia detection while BCM-over hydration (BCM-OH) values were higher in non-hypovolemic group (p=0.04) with sensitivity= 68.2% and specificity =75% for detection of hypervolemia. FeNa% showed negative significant correlation with IVCCI (r= -0.578, p <0.001) and positive significant correlation with BCM-OH (r= 0.33, p=0.018), while FeNa% showed non-significant correlation to plasma ANP concentration (p=0.25). Conclusion: Non-hypovolemic edema is more frequent in edematous INS children than hypovolemic states. IVCCI is a reliable non-invasive bedside tool for evaluating volume status in INS children and is superior to BCM while plasma ANP levels can’t discriminate type of edema in INS.
“…Patients with severe edema have marked hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin <1.5 g/dL), along with ascites and anasarca that interferes with daily activities [97,98]. Intravascular volume depletion is common in patients with moderate or severe edema [99,100], and should be assessed before instituting therapy with diuretics.…”
Section: Guideline 6: Management Of Hypovolemia and Edemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Subsequently, patients are managed with IV and oral hydration, and IV albumin (20%; 0.5-1 g/kg over 3-4 hr) [97,99,101].…”
Justification
Steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) is one of the most common chronic kidney diseases in children. These guidelines update the existing Indian Society of Pediatric Nephrology recommendations on its management.
Objective
To frame revised guidelines on diagnosis, evaluation, management and supportive care of patients with the illness.
Process
The guidelines combine evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion. Formulation of key questions was followed by review of literature and evaluation of evidence by experts in two face-to-face meetings.
Recommendations
The initial statements provide advice for evaluation at onset and follow up and indications for kidney biopsy. Subsequent statements provide recommendations for management of the first episode of illness and of disease relapses. Recommendations on the use of immunosuppressive strategies in patients with frequent relapses and steroid dependence are accompanied by suggestions for step-wise approach and plan of monitoring. Guidance is also provided regarding the management of common complications including edema, hypovolemia and serious infections. Advice on immunization and transition of care is given. The revised guideline is intended to improve the management and outcomes of patients with SSNS, and provide directions for future research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.