1956
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5005.1340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypnosis in the Casualty Department

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…96 The benefits of using hypnosis for painful procedures in the emergency setting were shown in 1956 for both children and adults. 97 Also, the susceptibility to hypnosis has been shown to be increased in children attending the emergency department due to their vivid imagination, and the stress of the situation. 98 Hypnosis can therefore be a valuable pain and stress control maneuver for staff able to employ the technique.…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Adjuncts To Analgesia and Anxiolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…96 The benefits of using hypnosis for painful procedures in the emergency setting were shown in 1956 for both children and adults. 97 Also, the susceptibility to hypnosis has been shown to be increased in children attending the emergency department due to their vivid imagination, and the stress of the situation. 98 Hypnosis can therefore be a valuable pain and stress control maneuver for staff able to employ the technique.…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Adjuncts To Analgesia and Anxiolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since children have more hypnotic ability than adults (measured by the Children’s Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale and the Stanford Hypnotic Scale for Children), several studies proposed hypnosis as a tool for procedural pain and chronic pain management in children, reporting a significative reduction in pain and anxiety and improving the patient experience [ 23 – 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients in need of anaesthesia at a casualty department (Goldie, 1956) or a prisoner of war camp (Sampimon & Woodruff, 1946) and in women in pregnancy and labour (Michael, 1952) even susceptibility to hypnosis is far higher than usual, and motivation was found by White (1941) to be a factor in determining hypnotic susceptibility. Goldie (1956) found such terms as 'depth' and 'susceptibility' misleading unless related to the state and situation of the subject: his impression was that some of the most anxious children were the most easily hypnotized, while the anaesthetic results of the hypnotic treatment proved best in those requiring immediate anaesthesia. In these subjects the state is indeed one of 'high drive'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%