Exploring Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1996
DOI: 10.1037/10186-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypnosis in sport and exercise psychology.

Abstract: Hypnosis in Sport and Exercise Psychologyt is remarkable that hypnosis has not been used more frequently by I workers in the field of sport and exercise psychology because the difference between success and failure is often minuscule. Indeed, the difference between a gold medal in Olympic competition and failure to even qualify for the final event is sometimes less than a hundredth of a second. Hence, any ergogenic procedure that might enhance performance by even a small margin (e.g., O.OOl%), providing it is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, our third goal is to appraise these studies using the criteria for empirically supported therapies advanced by Chambless and Hollon (1998). Over the last 15 years, there have been a number of selective reviews of the use of hypnosis in sport and exercise (Barker, Jones, & Greenlees, 2013; Morgan, 1996; Stegner & Morgan, 2010). However, ours is the first article to comprehensively review all controlled and single-case design outcome studies, to critique the methodology of this literature, and to identify investigations satisfying the criteria for empirically supported therapies (Chambless & Hollon, 1998).…”
Section: Hypnotic Enhancement Of Sports Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our third goal is to appraise these studies using the criteria for empirically supported therapies advanced by Chambless and Hollon (1998). Over the last 15 years, there have been a number of selective reviews of the use of hypnosis in sport and exercise (Barker, Jones, & Greenlees, 2013; Morgan, 1996; Stegner & Morgan, 2010). However, ours is the first article to comprehensively review all controlled and single-case design outcome studies, to critique the methodology of this literature, and to identify investigations satisfying the criteria for empirically supported therapies (Chambless & Hollon, 1998).…”
Section: Hypnotic Enhancement Of Sports Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morgan also cites the empirical studies of Warren Johnson [20] at the University of Maryland on the effect of hypnosis on improving the performance of a professional baseball players who was in a slump. In his appraisal of research, Morgan [19] indicates that most of the investigation have been conducted in laboratory setting and are therefore lacking in ecological validity. An important finding during the early years of sport hypnosis was that perception of effort could be systematically decreased or increased systematically by hypnosis during exercise [20,21].…”
Section: Discussion Of Hypnosis In Applied Sport Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the leading textbooks in sport psychology, only Van Raalte and Brewer [12] include an article on sport hypnosis. Weinberg and Gould [13], in their classic textbook, devote two pages to sport hypnosis.…”
Section: Discussion Of Hypnosis In Applied Sport Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En la actualidad, es posible observar que el uso de la hipnosis se ha vinculado con la ejecución de respuestas efectivas, como una condición que facilita la precisión y un desempeño óptimo de acuerdo a tareas específicas (e.g. Morgan, 2002;Morgan & Stegner, 2008;Pates, Maynar & Westbury, 2001;Pates, Oliver & Maynard, 2001) El estudio del comportamiento hipnótico ha implicado diversas formas de abordajes a lo largo de más de doscientos años, cuestión que ha dado pie a múltiples confusiones teóricas, debido a las polarizaciones que se dan por las explicaciones basadas en uno u otro aspecto que interviene en el fenómeno (Dixon & Laurence, 1992). Esto ha orientado el estudio del comportamiento hipnótico hacia los aspectos biológicos (Crawford & Gruzelier, 1992;Pavlov, 1929;Platonov, 1959;Wundt, 1892), lo social (Sarbin & Coe, 1972;Spanos & Coe, 1992), los procesos o mecanismos cognoscitivos (Hilgard, 1973(Hilgard, , 1992Kirsch & Lynn, 1998), la observación conductal, utilizando una lógica lineal causa-efecto (Barber, 1969;Skinner, 1957) o a las explicaciones eclécticas, donde se tornan irrelevantes las distinciones entre los tipos de funciones que poseen los diversos elementos (e.g.…”
unclassified