Many studies have suggested that conflict monitoring involves the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). We previously showed that a specific hypnotic suggestion reduces involuntary conflict and alters information processing in highly hypnotizable individuals. Hypothesizing that such conflict reduction would be associated with decreased ACC activation, we combined neuroimaging methods to provide high temporal and spatial resolution and studied highly and less-hypnotizable participants both with and without a suggestion to interpret visual words as nonsense strings. Functional MRI data revealed that under posthypnotic suggestion, both ACC and visual areas presented reduced activity in highly hypnotizable persons compared with either no-suggestion or less-hypnotizable controls. Scalp electrode recordings in highly hypnotizable subjects also showed reductions in posterior activation under suggestion, indicating visual system alterations. Our findings illuminate how suggestion affects cognitive control by modulating activity in specific brain areas, including early visual modules, and provide a more scientific account relating the neural effects of suggestion to placebo.anterior cingulate cortex ͉ attention ͉ hypnosis ͉ neuroimaging ͉ Stroop effect G eneral accounts of cognitive control identify the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) as a key to the monitoring of conflict within a network of neural regions (1-3). In multiple tasks that involve a conflict between competing responses, functional MRI (fMRI) studies have measured higher signal levels at the ACC in conditions when conflict was present (1-4).One conflict task showing reliable ACC activations requires proficient readers to name the ink color of a displayed word (5). Individuals are usually slower and less accurate indicating the ink color of an incompatible color word (e.g., responding ''blue'' when the word ''RED'' is displayed in blue ink) than identifying the ink color of a congruent color name (e.g., responding ''red'' when the word ''RED'' is inked in red). This difference in performance constitutes the Stroop conflict and is one of the most robust and well-studied phenomena in attentional research (6, 7). The dominant view regards reading as a largely automatic process whereby skilled readers cannot withhold activating a word's underlying meaning despite explicit instructions to attend only to its ink color. Indeed, the standard account maintains that semantic processing of words occurs involuntarily (6,8) and that the Stroop is a benchmark experimental task of cognitive conflict (9). Nonetheless, independent researchers have challenged the robustness of the Stroop effect (10, 11), suggesting that rather than being inevitable, other factors such as attention may govern the process (12). Although critiqued (13), this approach has resulted in data showing either reduction or removal of Stroop interference (14,15).Recently, we used hypnotic suggestion as an attentional tool to manipulate conflict (16). Whereas earlier case reports (17,18) and at least one...