SUMMARY: Branches of the primary mycelium of a Streptomyces sp. were observed, by phase-contrast microscopy of living material, to form apparent anastomoses.No enlarged structures capable of interpretation as ' initial cells ' were detected.It is suggested that certain of the large ' spore-like bodies ' described by previous workers in studies upon Streptomyces spp. may represent protoplasts.The life cycle proposed by Klieneberger-Nobel (1947) to explain nuclear and cytological appearances in Streptomyces species is briefly as follows. Spore germination by one or more germ tubes produces a slender much branched primary mycelium in and upon the substrate. Cellular fusion between branches of this mycelium, followed by nuclear fusion to yield a diploid 'initial cell', is then proposed to explain the origin of a diploid secondary aerial mycelium, the cytological appearance of which differs considerably from that of the primary mycelium. Spore formation at the extremities of the aerial hyphae is preceded by a nuclear reduction division giving once more haploid spores.An essential feature of this scheme is the fusion of cells and of nuclei in the primary mycelium. As pointed out by Bisset (1955) the details of this process have not been adequately described. The occurrence of cellular fusion, 'initial cells' and nuclear exchange are in fact all subjects of controversy (Davis, 1959).Klieneberger-Nobel (1947) described tangled 'nests ' of primary hyphae and suggested that fusion occurred a t these sites. Carvajal (1946) observed by electron microscopy apparent fusion between hyphae and between young germination tubes in Streptomyces griseus. Nest formation was described by Baldacci, Gilardi & Amici (1956) in the primary mycelium, and Dickenson & MacDonald (1955) claimed to demonstrate fusion in primary mycelium, without nest formation, by electron microscope observations. However, Erikson (1949, 1955) stated that fusion between primary mycelial elements never occurs, and that in fact growing hyphae avoid contact with each other under normal conditions. Gregory (1956) demonstrated apparent hyphal anastomosis by cell-wall staining techniques, although his illustrations do not prove beyond doubt that the cell walls at the point of hyphal contact were broken to form a truly anastomosing system. By using ultra-thin sections Stuart (1959) obtained beautiful photographs of mycelial branching and nuclear arrangements but was unable to detect any signs of anastomosis. These reports, all based upon observations of non-living material, therefore permit a variety of conclusions about the occurrence of cellular fusion.