2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.124390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypertranscendency of perturbations of hypertranscendental functions

Abstract: Inspired by the work of Bank on the hypertranscendence of Γe h where Γ is the Euler gamma function and h is an entire function, we investigate when a meromorphic function f e g cannot satisfy any algebraic differential equation over certain field of meromorphic functions, where f and g are meromorphic and entire on the complex plane, respectively. Our results (Theorem 1 and 2) give partial solutions to Bank's Conjecture (1977) on the hypertranscendence of Γe h. We also give some sufficient conditions for hyper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, by M k we mean the field of meromorphic functions f with T (r, f ) = o(r k ) as r → ∞ outside a set of finite measure and by C[z] we mean the ring of polynomials with complex number coefficients. The field M k appears naturally in the studies of some hypertranscendental functions (see for example [17]). Using some ideas from Eremenko and Rubel [14] and Ng and Yang [26], and the half-plane version of Borel's lemma by Rossi [32] (see Lemma 2.2), we obtain the following Theorem 1.2.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, by M k we mean the field of meromorphic functions f with T (r, f ) = o(r k ) as r → ∞ outside a set of finite measure and by C[z] we mean the ring of polynomials with complex number coefficients. The field M k appears naturally in the studies of some hypertranscendental functions (see for example [17]). Using some ideas from Eremenko and Rubel [14] and Ng and Yang [26], and the half-plane version of Borel's lemma by Rossi [32] (see Lemma 2.2), we obtain the following Theorem 1.2.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%