2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmcc.2002.2071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperthermia at 43°C for 2h Inhibits the Proliferation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells, but not Endothelial Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, studies performed in various cellular systems, demonstrated the ability of heat shock to decrease cell survival rate [26][27][28][29]. In agreement with those data, our results demonstrated as well that exposure of MEFs to heat shock resulted in a timedependent decrease in cell survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, studies performed in various cellular systems, demonstrated the ability of heat shock to decrease cell survival rate [26][27][28][29]. In agreement with those data, our results demonstrated as well that exposure of MEFs to heat shock resulted in a timedependent decrease in cell survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, a heat-shock-induced decrease in proliferation rate was demonstrated in several experimental systems, such as human fibroblasts, vascular smooth muscle, melanoma or malignant glioma cells [28,29,31,32]. In agreement with those studies, our data showed as well that exposure of MEFs to heat shock resulted in a clear decrease in the percentage of cells that incorporated BrdU, which was again more prominent in p65 À/À cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Orihara et al [19] reported that exposure of vascular smooth muscle cells to 43°C for 2 hours inhibited cell proliferation. Further work is required to assess whether HSP20 is involved in this response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from the cell cycle analysis demonstrated that there was significantly less progression to the G0/G1 phase in MSH-treated cells than in the control group 24 h following the heat treatment, suggesting S and G2/M phase arrest. Orihara et al (15) evaluated the effect of heating on VSMCs from the rat thoracic aorta and revealed that the results indicated G1 arrest (15). Two plausible explanations may account for the difference between the two observations: There was an interspecies difference between the two studies and the two heating approaches, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been revealed that repeated whole-body hyperthermia may improve vascular endothelial and cardiac functions in patients with chronic heart failure (14). Furthermore, Orihara et al showed that hyperthermia treatment (43°C, 2 h) was capable of inhibiting the proliferation of the dividing VSMCs without damaging the quiescent VSMCs (15). However, with regard to restenosis, which normally occurs at the site of the stent in the coronary artery, there is a requirement for localized or targeted heating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%