2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypertension resolution after adrenalectomy for primary hyperaldosteronism: Which is the best predictive model?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors have developed predictive models based on machine learning-procedures, reporting AUC of 0.867 (95% CI 0.763–0.971) based on the combination of duration of hypertension, defined daily dose (DDD) of antihypertensive medication, plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), sex, BMI, and age [25]. One previous study [26] has also compared the diagnostic accuracy of Wachtel's, Utsumi's and Zarnegar's models, describing that Utsumi's was the model that demonstrated the highest predictive validity in two different cohorts (American and French). Our study is the first to test the diagnostic accuracy of these models in a Spanish population, showing that the accuracy was higher than that observed in the French and American population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have developed predictive models based on machine learning-procedures, reporting AUC of 0.867 (95% CI 0.763–0.971) based on the combination of duration of hypertension, defined daily dose (DDD) of antihypertensive medication, plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), sex, BMI, and age [25]. One previous study [26] has also compared the diagnostic accuracy of Wachtel's, Utsumi's and Zarnegar's models, describing that Utsumi's was the model that demonstrated the highest predictive validity in two different cohorts (American and French). Our study is the first to test the diagnostic accuracy of these models in a Spanish population, showing that the accuracy was higher than that observed in the French and American population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the PASO score and the Utsumi nomogram due to the relatively small number of external validation studies ( n < 4), we cannot draw definite conclusions regarding the generalizability and usefulness of these models in clinical practice. The ARS model is supported by stronger evidence compared with other scoring systems 13,14,17–21,31–41,43,48,49 and therefore we believe that it is an accurate and reliable prediction model which is the most user‐friendly and the least costly to identify long‐term high likelihood of CRH after adrenalectomy for UPA, particularly when adrenalectomy is adrenal vein sampling‐guided, regardless of imaging results 13 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The four-item aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) using the regression coefficients of the Utsumi et al (2014) Japanese model has been shown to have superior accuracy. 10 Four preoperative clinical parameters including BMI, sex, duration of hypertension and number of preoperative antihypertensive medications are taken into account to calculate the ARS. 11 The use of predictive models, especially when there is low likelihood of biochemical/clinical success, and the diagnostic difficulty presented by localising unilateral PA should not be a deterrent to surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%