1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5385-4_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypertension and Coronary Microvascular Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been demonstrated in experimental hypertension 70,71 as well as clinically. 32,54,72,73 For example, in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) treated with either an ACE inhibitor, an angiotensin II (type 1) receptor antagonist, or both (in studies designed to produce equivalent reductions in arterial pressure with each of these 3 treatment options), it was possible to demonstrate significant physiological improvement using these therapies. [71][72][73] Most intriguing was the greater-than-additive flow reserves with combination therapy.…”
Section: Coronary Insufficiency Coronary Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been demonstrated in experimental hypertension 70,71 as well as clinically. 32,54,72,73 For example, in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) treated with either an ACE inhibitor, an angiotensin II (type 1) receptor antagonist, or both (in studies designed to produce equivalent reductions in arterial pressure with each of these 3 treatment options), it was possible to demonstrate significant physiological improvement using these therapies. [71][72][73] Most intriguing was the greater-than-additive flow reserves with combination therapy.…”
Section: Coronary Insufficiency Coronary Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,54,72,73 For example, in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) treated with either an ACE inhibitor, an angiotensin II (type 1) receptor antagonist, or both (in studies designed to produce equivalent reductions in arterial pressure with each of these 3 treatment options), it was possible to demonstrate significant physiological improvement using these therapies. [71][72][73] Most intriguing was the greater-than-additive flow reserves with combination therapy. 71 This can be explained by the coronary vasodilation induced by inhibition of angiotensin II-mediated constriction with the ACE inhibitor, further inhibition of additionally generated angiotensin II by intracardiac chymase, 74 augmented bradykinin-induced vasodilation induced by the ACE inhibitor, 7,75 as well as the beneficial effect on the endothelially produced natural vasodilator nitric oxide.…”
Section: Coronary Insufficiency Coronary Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%